Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: Clinical impact of 28 cases

Background The aim of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Patients and Methods Twenty‐eight esophageal achalasia patients who underwent POEM in our institution between August 2010 and October 2012 were enrolled. Under general a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive endoscopy 2014-01, Vol.26 (1), p.43-51
Hauptverfasser: Minami, Hitomi, Isomoto, Hajime, Yamaguchi, Naoyuki, Matsushima, Kayoko, Akazawa, Yuko, Ohnita, Ken, Takeshima, Fuminao, Inoue, Haruhiro, Nakao, Kazuhiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The aim of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Patients and Methods Twenty‐eight esophageal achalasia patients who underwent POEM in our institution between August 2010 and October 2012 were enrolled. Under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation, initial incision was made on the anterior wall of the esophagus after submucosal injection. Submucosal tunnel was created and extended below the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) onto the gastric cardia. Subsequently, myotomy was done using triangle tip knife. After confirmation of smooth passage of scope through the esophagogastric junction, the entry was closed. Esophagogram and manometry study was done before and after the procedure. Also, subjective symptom score and Eckardt score were assessed before and 3 months after POEM. Results POEM was successfully done in all cases without any severe complications such as perforation and mediastinitis.Mean procedure time was 99.1 min (range 61–160) and mean myotomy length was 14.4 cm (range 10–18). Significant improvement was achieved in both esophagogram and endoscopic findings. Mean LES pressure was 71.2 mmHg (35.8–119.0) and 21.0 mmHg (6.7–41.0) before and after the procedure (P 
ISSN:0915-5635
1443-1661
DOI:10.1111/den.12086