In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum
Objective To compare a unidirectional barbed suture (V‐Loc™) to its suture material equivalent (Biosyn™) in a single‐layer end‐to‐end anastomosis of equine jejunum. Study Design Experimental in vitro study. Animals Jejunal sections from adult horses (n = 5) without gastrointestinal disease. Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary surgery 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.80-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Veterinary surgery |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Nelson, Brad B. Hassel, Diana M. |
description | Objective
To compare a unidirectional barbed suture (V‐Loc™) to its suture material equivalent (Biosyn™) in a single‐layer end‐to‐end anastomosis of equine jejunum.
Study Design
Experimental in vitro study.
Animals
Jejunal sections from adult horses (n = 5) without gastrointestinal disease.
Methods
Jejunal end‐to‐end anastomoses (n = 9) were performed for each group (V‐Loc™, Biosyn™) with a continuous Lembert pattern with an interruption every 120°. Anastomosis construction time, luminal diameter, and number of suture bites were recorded. Anastomosis constructs were distended with fluid at 1 L/min until failure. Location and intraluminal pressure at failure were recorded and all measurements were compared between groups.
Results
V‐Loc™ anastomoses were significantly faster to perform (13.1 ± 0.35 minutes) when compared to the Biosyn™ group (15.6 ± 0.72 minutes; P = .0004). No differences were observed for anastomotic index or number of suture bites. V‐Loc™ anastomosis constructs had a significantly decreased bursting pressure (160 ± 11.6 mmHg) compared to Biosyn™ constructs (184 ± 16.9 mmHg; P = .01).
Conclusions
V‐Loc™ allowed faster construction time and did not cause a decreased anastomosis luminal diameter when compared with Biosyn™. V‐Loc™ had a decreased bursting strength compared with Biosyn™, albeit well above pathologic pressures encountered clinically. Use of V‐Loc™ may be beneficial for decreasing the amount of exposed suture material because of the absence of knots after construction and has the potential to result in decreased adhesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12081.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490738241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3171342621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5021-13f5055f30e882585f5d64e01ae9d5b130901e4c68528c153566ff25cbb4b3bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFZAlNmwcfP2TcTZItECpGMECOrCznIwjHBJ7aidlZs-T8Gg8CU6nzIIV3lzL_u659jkIYaAF5PWiK0ByRipJvxaMAi-AUQXF7h5aHC_uowWFEggXVXWCHqXUUUorIfhDdMIEkyUHuUDfLj2-cWMMuAnD1kSXgsehxWuyCs3vn7_wjY1pSvjMhbT384Hz2ODgLenN3kZs_YaMgeSCjTdpDENILs0S9npy3uLOdpOfhsfoQWv6ZJ_c1VN09fbN5_N3ZPXx4vL81Yo0kjIgwFtJpWw5tUoxqWQrN6WwFIytNrIGTisKVjSlkkw1-bOyLNuWyaauRc3rlp-i5wfdbQzXk02jHlxqbN8bb8OUNIiKLrliAjL67B-0C1P0-XWZWvJSAhVVptSBamJIKdpWb6MbTNxroHpOQ3d6Nl3Ppus5DX2bht7l1qd3A6Z6sJtj41_7M_DyAPxwvd3_t7Bef7q63WYBchBwabS7o4CJ33W55Eupv3y40K9ZBWfv10oD_wM3aqhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1473651049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nelson, Brad B. ; Hassel, Diana M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brad B. ; Hassel, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare a unidirectional barbed suture (V‐Loc™) to its suture material equivalent (Biosyn™) in a single‐layer end‐to‐end anastomosis of equine jejunum.
Study Design
Experimental in vitro study.
Animals
Jejunal sections from adult horses (n = 5) without gastrointestinal disease.
Methods
Jejunal end‐to‐end anastomoses (n = 9) were performed for each group (V‐Loc™, Biosyn™) with a continuous Lembert pattern with an interruption every 120°. Anastomosis construction time, luminal diameter, and number of suture bites were recorded. Anastomosis constructs were distended with fluid at 1 L/min until failure. Location and intraluminal pressure at failure were recorded and all measurements were compared between groups.
Results
V‐Loc™ anastomoses were significantly faster to perform (13.1 ± 0.35 minutes) when compared to the Biosyn™ group (15.6 ± 0.72 minutes; P = .0004). No differences were observed for anastomotic index or number of suture bites. V‐Loc™ anastomosis constructs had a significantly decreased bursting pressure (160 ± 11.6 mmHg) compared to Biosyn™ constructs (184 ± 16.9 mmHg; P = .01).
Conclusions
V‐Loc™ allowed faster construction time and did not cause a decreased anastomosis luminal diameter when compared with Biosyn™. V‐Loc™ had a decreased bursting strength compared with Biosyn™, albeit well above pathologic pressures encountered clinically. Use of V‐Loc™ may be beneficial for decreasing the amount of exposed suture material because of the absence of knots after construction and has the potential to result in decreased adhesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12081.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24256315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - instrumentation ; Anastomosis, Surgical - methods ; Anastomosis, Surgical - veterinary ; Animals ; Comparative studies ; Dioxanes ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Horses ; Horses - surgery ; In Vitro Techniques ; Jejunum - surgery ; Polymers ; Surgical techniques ; Sutures - standards ; Sutures - veterinary ; Tensile Strength ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.80-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright 2013 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5021-13f5055f30e882585f5d64e01ae9d5b130901e4c68528c153566ff25cbb4b3bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5021-13f5055f30e882585f5d64e01ae9d5b130901e4c68528c153566ff25cbb4b3bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-950X.2013.12081.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-950X.2013.12081.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24256315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassel, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Veterinary Surgery</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare a unidirectional barbed suture (V‐Loc™) to its suture material equivalent (Biosyn™) in a single‐layer end‐to‐end anastomosis of equine jejunum.
Study Design
Experimental in vitro study.
Animals
Jejunal sections from adult horses (n = 5) without gastrointestinal disease.
Methods
Jejunal end‐to‐end anastomoses (n = 9) were performed for each group (V‐Loc™, Biosyn™) with a continuous Lembert pattern with an interruption every 120°. Anastomosis construction time, luminal diameter, and number of suture bites were recorded. Anastomosis constructs were distended with fluid at 1 L/min until failure. Location and intraluminal pressure at failure were recorded and all measurements were compared between groups.
Results
V‐Loc™ anastomoses were significantly faster to perform (13.1 ± 0.35 minutes) when compared to the Biosyn™ group (15.6 ± 0.72 minutes; P = .0004). No differences were observed for anastomotic index or number of suture bites. V‐Loc™ anastomosis constructs had a significantly decreased bursting pressure (160 ± 11.6 mmHg) compared to Biosyn™ constructs (184 ± 16.9 mmHg; P = .01).
Conclusions
V‐Loc™ allowed faster construction time and did not cause a decreased anastomosis luminal diameter when compared with Biosyn™. V‐Loc™ had a decreased bursting strength compared with Biosyn™, albeit well above pathologic pressures encountered clinically. Use of V‐Loc™ may be beneficial for decreasing the amount of exposed suture material because of the absence of knots after construction and has the potential to result in decreased adhesions.</description><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - veterinary</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dioxanes</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Horses - surgery</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Jejunum - surgery</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Sutures - standards</subject><subject>Sutures - veterinary</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFZAlNmwcfP2TcTZItECpGMECOrCznIwjHBJ7aidlZs-T8Gg8CU6nzIIV3lzL_u659jkIYaAF5PWiK0ByRipJvxaMAi-AUQXF7h5aHC_uowWFEggXVXWCHqXUUUorIfhDdMIEkyUHuUDfLj2-cWMMuAnD1kSXgsehxWuyCs3vn7_wjY1pSvjMhbT384Hz2ODgLenN3kZs_YaMgeSCjTdpDENILs0S9npy3uLOdpOfhsfoQWv6ZJ_c1VN09fbN5_N3ZPXx4vL81Yo0kjIgwFtJpWw5tUoxqWQrN6WwFIytNrIGTisKVjSlkkw1-bOyLNuWyaauRc3rlp-i5wfdbQzXk02jHlxqbN8bb8OUNIiKLrliAjL67B-0C1P0-XWZWvJSAhVVptSBamJIKdpWb6MbTNxroHpOQ3d6Nl3Ppus5DX2bht7l1qd3A6Z6sJtj41_7M_DyAPxwvd3_t7Bef7q63WYBchBwabS7o4CJ33W55Eupv3y40K9ZBWfv10oD_wM3aqhU</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Nelson, Brad B.</creator><creator>Hassel, Diana M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum</title><author>Nelson, Brad B. ; Hassel, Diana M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5021-13f5055f30e882585f5d64e01ae9d5b130901e4c68528c153566ff25cbb4b3bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - veterinary</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dioxanes</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Horses - surgery</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Jejunum - surgery</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Sutures - standards</topic><topic>Sutures - veterinary</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassel, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Brad B.</au><au>Hassel, Diana M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Veterinary Surgery</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>80-84</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare a unidirectional barbed suture (V‐Loc™) to its suture material equivalent (Biosyn™) in a single‐layer end‐to‐end anastomosis of equine jejunum.
Study Design
Experimental in vitro study.
Animals
Jejunal sections from adult horses (n = 5) without gastrointestinal disease.
Methods
Jejunal end‐to‐end anastomoses (n = 9) were performed for each group (V‐Loc™, Biosyn™) with a continuous Lembert pattern with an interruption every 120°. Anastomosis construction time, luminal diameter, and number of suture bites were recorded. Anastomosis constructs were distended with fluid at 1 L/min until failure. Location and intraluminal pressure at failure were recorded and all measurements were compared between groups.
Results
V‐Loc™ anastomoses were significantly faster to perform (13.1 ± 0.35 minutes) when compared to the Biosyn™ group (15.6 ± 0.72 minutes; P = .0004). No differences were observed for anastomotic index or number of suture bites. V‐Loc™ anastomosis constructs had a significantly decreased bursting pressure (160 ± 11.6 mmHg) compared to Biosyn™ constructs (184 ± 16.9 mmHg; P = .01).
Conclusions
V‐Loc™ allowed faster construction time and did not cause a decreased anastomosis luminal diameter when compared with Biosyn™. V‐Loc™ had a decreased bursting strength compared with Biosyn™, albeit well above pathologic pressures encountered clinically. Use of V‐Loc™ may be beneficial for decreasing the amount of exposed suture material because of the absence of knots after construction and has the potential to result in decreased adhesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24256315</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12081.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-3499 |
ispartof | Veterinary surgery, 2014-01, Vol.43 (1), p.80-84 |
issn | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490738241 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Anastomosis, Surgical - instrumentation Anastomosis, Surgical - methods Anastomosis, Surgical - veterinary Animals Comparative studies Dioxanes Gastrointestinal diseases Horses Horses - surgery In Vitro Techniques Jejunum - surgery Polymers Surgical techniques Sutures - standards Sutures - veterinary Tensile Strength Veterinary medicine |
title | In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20comparison%20of%20V-Loc%E2%84%A2%20versus%20Biosyn%E2%84%A2%20in%20a%20one-layer%20end-to-end%20anastomosis%20of%20equine%20jejunum&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Nelson,%20Brad%20B.&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=80-84&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12081.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3171342621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1473651049&rft_id=info:pmid/24256315&rfr_iscdi=true |