High Ki-67 score is indicative of a greater benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy when added to endocrine therapy in Luminal B HER2 negative and node-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background The indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with highly proliferative estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is controversial. We analyzed the predictive value of Ki67 for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast (Edinburgh) 2014-02, Vol.23 (1), p.69-75
Hauptverfasser: Criscitiello, Carmen, Disalvatore, Davide, De Laurentiis, Michele, Gelao, Lucia, Fumagalli, Luca, Locatelli, Marzia, Bagnardi, Vincenzo, Rotmensz, Nicole, Esposito, Angela, Minchella, Ida, De Placido, Sabino, Santangelo, Michele, Viale, Giuseppe, Goldhirsch, Aron, Curigliano, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with highly proliferative estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is controversial. We analyzed the predictive value of Ki67 for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods We identified 1241 patients with Luminal B early stage breast cancer with 1–3 axillary positive nodes who underwent surgery between 1995 and 2005 at the European Institute of Oncology and received adjuvant hormonotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Differences in the distribution of characteristics according to treatment were evaluated by the Chi-square test. To evaluate the effect of adding chemotherapy to hormonotherapy, the propensity score method was used to match patients' characteristics minimizing bias related to the non-random assignment of treatment. Results The probability of receiving chemotherapy was significantly associated with age, tumor grade, degree of hormone responsiveness, tumor size and peripheral vascular invasion. The propensity score distribution was statistically different between the two treatment groups ( p  
ISSN:0960-9776
1532-3080
DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.007