Diffusion analysis with triexponential function in hepatic steatosis

Our purpose was to assess the influence of liver steatosis on diffusion by triexponential analysis. Thirty-three patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with multiple b values for perfusion-related diffusion, fast free diffusion, and slow restricted diffusion coefficients (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiological physics and technology 2014-01, Vol.7 (1), p.89-94
Hauptverfasser: Hayashi, Tatsuya, Miyati, Tosiaki, Takahashi, Junji, Tsuji, Yoshinori, Suzuki, Hidesato, Tagaya, Naomi, Hiramoto, Mariko, Fukuzawa, Kei, Tano, Masakatsu, Saitoh, Satoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our purpose was to assess the influence of liver steatosis on diffusion by triexponential analysis. Thirty-three patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with multiple b values for perfusion-related diffusion, fast free diffusion, and slow restricted diffusion coefficients ( D p , D f , D s ) and fractions ( F p , F f , F s ). They also underwent dual-echo gradient-echo imaging for measurement of the hepatic fat fraction (HFF). Of these, 13 patients were included in the control group and 20 in the fatty liver group with HFF >5 %. The parameters of the two groups were compared by use of the Mann–Whitney U test. The relationships between diffusion coefficients and HFFs were assessed by use of the Pearson correlation. D p and D f were reduced significantly in the steatotic liver group compared with those in the control group ( D p  = 27.72 ± 6.61 × 10 −3 vs. 33.33 ± 6.47 × 10 −3  mm 2 /s, P  = 0.0072; D f  = 1.70 ± 0.53 × 10 −3 vs. 2.06 ± 0.40 × 10 −3  mm 2 /s, P  = 0.0224). There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups. Furthermore, D p and D f were correlated with HFF ( P  
ISSN:1865-0333
1865-0341
DOI:10.1007/s12194-013-0235-0