Diffusion analysis with triexponential function in hepatic steatosis
Our purpose was to assess the influence of liver steatosis on diffusion by triexponential analysis. Thirty-three patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with multiple b values for perfusion-related diffusion, fast free diffusion, and slow restricted diffusion coefficients (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiological physics and technology 2014-01, Vol.7 (1), p.89-94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Our purpose was to assess the influence of liver steatosis on diffusion by triexponential analysis. Thirty-three patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with multiple
b
values for perfusion-related diffusion, fast free diffusion, and slow restricted diffusion coefficients (
D
p
,
D
f
,
D
s
) and fractions (
F
p
,
F
f
,
F
s
). They also underwent dual-echo gradient-echo imaging for measurement of the hepatic fat fraction (HFF). Of these, 13 patients were included in the control group and 20 in the fatty liver group with HFF >5 %. The parameters of the two groups were compared by use of the Mann–Whitney
U
test. The relationships between diffusion coefficients and HFFs were assessed by use of the Pearson correlation.
D
p
and
D
f
were reduced significantly in the steatotic liver group compared with those in the control group (
D
p
= 27.72 ± 6.61 × 10
−3
vs. 33.33 ± 6.47 × 10
−3
mm
2
/s,
P
= 0.0072;
D
f
= 1.70 ± 0.53 × 10
−3
vs. 2.06 ± 0.40 × 10
−3
mm
2
/s,
P
= 0.0224). There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups. Furthermore,
D
p
and
D
f
were correlated with HFF (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1865-0333 1865-0341 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12194-013-0235-0 |