Consecutive reaction kinetics involving a layered structure of the granule in UASB reactors
A consecutive-reaction kinetic model for the sucrose-fed upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor that accounts for a layered structure of the granule and the mass fraction of methanogens ( f) is proposed. When the UASB reactor was maintained at the volumetric loading rates (VLR) of 7.9–13.8 kg ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2006-08, Vol.40 (15), p.2947-2957 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A consecutive-reaction kinetic model for the sucrose-fed upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor that accounts for a layered structure of the granule and the mass fraction of methanogens (
f) is proposed. When the UASB reactor was maintained at the volumetric loading rates (VLR) of 7.9–13.8
kg chemical oxygen demand (COD)/m
3
d, the accumulated volatile fatty acids (VFAs) increased with increasing VLR, whereas the experimental
f decreased with increasing VLR. This was primarily because methanogenesis was the rate-limiting step and the sucrose-fed granule was a layered structure. The calculated residual concentrations of sucrose and the intermediates VFAs using the layered-structure model are less deviated from the experimental measurements than those using the homogeneous-structure model. The calculated effectiveness factors for sucrose uptake and intermediates VFAs uptake (
η
1;
η
2) ranged from 0.18 to 0.35 and 0.65 to 0.96, respectively, indicating that the overall substrate (sucrose or intermediates VFAs) removal in the UASB reactor was diffusion-controlled, especially at the VLRs of 7.9–10.6.
kg
COD/m
3
d. This finding was also confirmed by the simulated concentration profiles of sucrose and VFAs in the UASB-granule. From the simulation results, the effect of internal mass transfer resistance on overall substrate (sucrose) removal should not be neglected, especially for a granule size of greater than 2.0
mm. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2006.05.024 |