Safety and efficacy of protease inhibitors to treat hepatitis C after liver transplantation: A multicenter experience

Background & Aims Protease inhibitors (PI) with peginterferon/ribavirin have significantly improved SVR rates in HCV G1 patients. Their use to treat HCV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is a challenge. Methods This cohort study included 37 liver transplant recipients (male, 92%, age 5...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepatology 2014-01, Vol.60 (1), p.78-86
Hauptverfasser: Coilly, Audrey, Roche, Bruno, Dumortier, Jérôme, Leroy, Vincent, Botta-Fridlund, Danielle, Radenne, Sylvie, Pageaux, Georges-Philippe, Si-Ahmed, Si-Nafaa, Guillaud, Olivier, Antonini, Teresa Maria, Haïm-Boukobza, Stéphanie, Roque-Afonso, Anne-Marie, Samuel, Didier, Duclos-Vallée, Jean-Charles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background & Aims Protease inhibitors (PI) with peginterferon/ribavirin have significantly improved SVR rates in HCV G1 patients. Their use to treat HCV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is a challenge. Methods This cohort study included 37 liver transplant recipients (male, 92%, age 57 ± 11 years), treated with boceprevir (n = 18) or telaprevir (n = 19). The indication for therapy was HCV recurrence (fibrosis stage ⩾F2 (n = 31, 83%) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 6, 16%). Results Eighteen patients were treatment-naive, five were relapsers and fourteen were non-responders to dual therapy after LT. Twenty-two patients received cyclosporine and fifteen tacrolimus. After 12 weeks of PI therapy, a complete virological response was obtained in 89% of patients treated with boceprevir, and 58% with telaprevir ( p = 0.06). The end of treatment virological response rate was 72% (13/18) in the boceprevir group and 40% (4/10) in the telaprevir group ( p = 0.125). A sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation was observed in 20% (1/5) and 71% (5/7) of patients in the telaprevir and boceprevir groups, respectively ( p = 0.24). Treatment was discontinued in sixteen patients (treatment failures (n = 11), adverse events (n = 5)). Infections occurred in ten patients (27%), with three fatal outcomes (8%). The most common adverse effect was anemia (n = 34, 92%), treated with erythropoietin and/or a ribavirin dose reduction; thirteen patients (35%) received red blood cell transfusions. The cyclosporine dose was reduced by 1.8 ± 1.1-fold and 3.4 ± 1.0-fold with boceprevir and telaprevir, respectively. The tacrolimus dose was reduced by 5.2 ± 1.5-fold with boceprevir and 23.8 ± 18.2-fold with telaprevir. Conclusions Our results suggest that triple therapy is effective in LT recipients, particularly those experiencing a severe recurrence. The occurrence of anemia and drug-drug interactions, and the risk of infections require close monitoring.
ISSN:0168-8278
1600-0641
DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.018