The effect of head position on the distribution of topical nasal medication using the Mucosal Atomization Device: a cadaver study

Background The Mucosal Atomization Device (MAD) distributes medication throughout the paranasal sinuses for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Determining the optimal head position is important to ensure maximal delivery of medication to the sinus cavities. The objective of this work was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International forum of allergy & rhinology 2013-12, Vol.3 (12), p.958-962
Hauptverfasser: Habib, Al-Rahim R., Thamboo, Andrew, Manji, Jamil, Dar Santos, Rachelle C., Gan, Eng Cern, Anstead, Amy, Javer, Amin R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The Mucosal Atomization Device (MAD) distributes medication throughout the paranasal sinuses for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Determining the optimal head position is important to ensure maximal delivery of medication to the sinus cavities. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of the lying‐head‐back (LHB) and head‐down and forward (HDF) position, on the distribution of topical nasal medication via MAD in cadaver specimens. Methods Twenty specimens having received complete functional endoscopic sinus dissection were chosen. The MAD was used to administer 2 mL of fluorescein‐impregnated saline solution through the nose in both the LHB and HDF positions. Fluorescein was identified on 11 predetermined anatomical areas using a blue light filter. Three blinded investigators assessed endoscopic images to determine the presence of fluorescein. Results A total of 440 anatomical locations (n = 20 cadavers) received administration of the fluorescein nasal spray in the LHB or HDF position. LHB position had significantly greater total distribution to all pertinent anatomical sites than the HDF position (76% vs 41%; p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.44). The proportion of staining was significantly greater for the ethmoid (p = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05–0.66), frontal (p < 0.01; 95% CI, 0.20–0.80), and sphenoid sinuses (p = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.07–0.73) when compared to the HDF position. Conclusion A greater distribution of medication to the sinonasal cavities was observed in the LHB position compared to the HDF position. These areas are of particular clinical relevance in postsurgical patients with refractory CRS.
ISSN:2042-6976
2042-6984
DOI:10.1002/alr.21222