Vitamin D in endometriosis: A causative or confounding factor?
Abstract Objective The aim of this paper is to review the evidence from studies that evaluated the relationship between vitamin D and endometriosis. Design Comprehensive review. Materials and Methods Systematic literature search in Medline for relevant publications from 1946 until June 2013. Results...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Metabolism, clinical and experimental clinical and experimental, 2014, Vol.63 (1), p.32-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective The aim of this paper is to review the evidence from studies that evaluated the relationship between vitamin D and endometriosis. Design Comprehensive review. Materials and Methods Systematic literature search in Medline for relevant publications from 1946 until June 2013. Results Endometriosis risk may be influenced by dietary vitamin D intake and plasma hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Vitamin D receptor and vitamin D metabolizing enzymes, 24-hydroxylase and 1-α hydroxylase, are found in the normal cycling endometrium and also in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. The endometrium is a target of 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D actions through regulation of specific genes and via immunomodulation. The endometrium in endometriosis expresses dysregulation of some vitamin D enzymes and receptors. If vitamin D and its metabolites are implicated in endometriosis-associated infertility, it is likely through interference with HOXA10 gene expression. The Gc2 phenotype of vitamin D binding protein is prevalent in women with endometriosis and may be implicated in its pathogenesis. In a mouse model, Elocalcitol, a VDR-agonist was shown to reduce the development of endometriotic lesions and recurrence. Conclusion A biological plausibility for a role of vitamin D, as an immunomodulator and anti-inflammatory agent, in the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis is suggested in this article, but is difficult to illustrate due to sparse evidence from human studies limited primarily to case–control studies. A significant knowledge gap precludes the establishment of a clear cause–effect relationship. The intriguing leads presented herein need to be investigated further with placebo-controlled supplementation trials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0026-0495 1532-8600 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.metabol.2013.09.012 |