HbA1c, fasting and 2 h plasma glucose in current, ex- and never-smokers: a meta-analysis

Aims/Hypothesis The relationships between smoking and glycaemic variables have not been well explored. We compared HbA 1c , fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2 h plasma glucose (2H-PG) in current, ex- and never-smokers. Methods This meta-analysis used individual data from 16,886 men and 18,539 women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetologia 2014-01, Vol.57 (1), p.30-39
Hauptverfasser: Soulimane, Soraya, Simon, Dominique, Herman, William H., Lange, Celine, Lee, Crystal M. Y., Colagiuri, Stephen, Shaw, Jonathan E., Zimmet, Paul Z., Magliano, Dianna, Ferreira, Sandra R. G., Dong, Yanghu, Zhang, Lei, Jorgensen, Torben, Tuomilehto, Jaakko, Mohan, Viswanathan, Christensen, Dirk L., Kaduka, Lydia, Dekker, Jacqueline M., Nijpels, Giel, Stehouwer, Coen D. A., Lantieri, Olivier, Fujimoto, Wilfred Y., Leonetti, Donna L., McNeely, Marguerite J., Borch-Johnsen, Knut, Boyko, Edward J., Vistisen, Dorte, Balkau, Beverley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims/Hypothesis The relationships between smoking and glycaemic variables have not been well explored. We compared HbA 1c , fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2 h plasma glucose (2H-PG) in current, ex- and never-smokers. Methods This meta-analysis used individual data from 16,886 men and 18,539 women without known diabetes in 12 DETECT-2 consortium studies and in the French Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) and Telecom studies. Means of three glycaemic variables in current, ex- and never-smokers were modelled by linear regression, with study as a random factor. The I 2 statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity among studies. Results HbA 1c was 0.10% (95% CI 0.08, 0.12) (1.1 mmol/mol [0.9, 1.3]) higher in current smokers and 0.03% (0.01, 0.05) (0.3 mmol/mol [0.1, 0.5]) higher in ex-smokers, compared with never-smokers. For FPG, there was no significant difference between current and never-smokers (−0.004 mmol/l [−0.03, 0.02]) but FPG was higher in ex-smokers (0.12 mmol/l [0.09, 0.14]). In comparison with never-smokers, 2H-PG was lower (−0.44 mmol/l [−0.52, −0.37]) in current smokers, with no difference for ex-smokers (0.02 mmol/l [−0.06, 0.09]). There was a large and unexplained heterogeneity among studies, with I 2 always above 50%; I 2 was little changed after stratification by sex and adjustment for age and BMI. In this study population, current smokers had a prevalence of diabetes that was 1.30% higher as screened by HbA 1c and 0.52% lower as screened by 2H-PG, in comparison with never-smokers. Conclusion/interpretation Across this heterogeneous group of studies, current smokers had a higher HbA 1c and lower 2H-PG than never-smokers. This will affect the chances of smokers being diagnosed with diabetes.
ISSN:0012-186X
1432-0428
DOI:10.1007/s00125-013-3058-y