Clinical Use of a New Position-independent Rebound Tonometer
PURPOSE:To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by rebound tonometry (Icare PRO tonometer), applanation tonometry (Goldmann and Perkins tonometry), and dynamic contour tonometry in the upright and the supine positions, and to investigate the influence of axial length and central...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of glaucoma 2013-12, Vol.22 (9), p.763-767 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | PURPOSE:To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by rebound tonometry (Icare PRO tonometer), applanation tonometry (Goldmann and Perkins tonometry), and dynamic contour tonometry in the upright and the supine positions, and to investigate the influence of axial length and central corneal thickness.
METHODS:Ninety-nine right eyes of 99 patients with glaucoma or suspect for glaucoma, admitted to our department between November 2010 and January 2011 to obtain an IOP profile including supine measurements, were included in our study. IOP measurements were obtained in an upright position using an Icare PRO rebound (RTPRO), a Goldmann applanation (GAT), and a Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT). In the supine position, IOP measurements were taken using the RTPRO and a Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer (PAT). The means and SDs for all tonometers were compared. Agreement between the tonometers was calculated using the Bland-Altman method.
RESULTS:The mean IOPs obtained in the upright position were 17.7±8.0 mm Hg (RTPRO), 17.6±7.8 mm Hg (GAT), and 19.9±6.6 mm Hg (DCT). Correlation analysis of these data indicated a good correlation between IOP readings obtained using RTPRO and GAT (r=0.951; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1057-0829 1536-481X |
DOI: | 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318259aa47 |