Differences in shoot and root terpenoid profiles and plant responses to fertilisation in Tanacetum vulgare
Chemotypes of Tanacetum vulgare differ in their shoot and root terpene profiles and respond differently to fertilisation, with leaf terpenoid concentrations decreasing with increasing fertiliser supply independent of chemotype. •Tanacetum vulgare forms chemotypes differing in shoot terpenoid composi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Phytochemistry (Oxford) 2013-12, Vol.96, p.123-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Chemotypes of Tanacetum vulgare differ in their shoot and root terpene profiles and respond differently to fertilisation, with leaf terpenoid concentrations decreasing with increasing fertiliser supply independent of chemotype.
•Tanacetum vulgare forms chemotypes differing in shoot terpenoid composition.•Roots contained mainly sesquiterpenoids and weakly mirrored the chemotype grouping.•Some growth-related traits responded chemotype-specific to fertilisation.•Leaf terpenoids decreased with increasing fertiliser, while roots were unaffected.•Shoots and roots must be under different selection pressures.
Intraspecific chemical diversity is a common phenomenon especially found in shoots of essential oil-accumulating plant species. Abiotic factors can influence the concentration of essential oils, but the effects are inconsistent and little is known in how far these may vary within an individual and within species between chemotypes. Tanacetum vulgare L. occurs in various chemotypes that differ in the composition of mono- and sesquiterpenoids in their shoot tissues. We investigated how far shoot chemotype grouping is mirrored in root terpenoid profiles. Furthermore, we studied whether different fertilisation amounts influence the plant growth and morphological traits as well as the constitutive terpenoid concentration of leaves and roots of three chemotypes, trans-carvyl acetate, β-thujone, and camphor, to different degrees. Shoot terpenoids were dominated by monoterpenoids, while the roots contained mainly sesquiterpenoids. The clear grouping in three chemotypes based on leaf chemistry was weakly mirrored in the root terpenoid composition. Furthermore, the leaf C/N ratio and the stem height differed between chemotypes. All plants responded to increased nutrient availability with increased total biomass and specific leaf area but decreased C/N and root/shoot ratios. Leaf terpenoid concentrations decreased with increasing fertiliser supply, independent of chemotype. In contrast to the leaves, the terpenoid concentrations of the roots were unaffected by fertilisation. Our results demonstrate that aboveground and belowground organs within a species can be under different selection pressures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-9422 1873-3700 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.09.018 |