Prior Commitments: Compatible Interests versus Capabilities in Alliance Behavior
The trade-off model of alliances offers a theory of alliance formation & duration that has significantly advanced our understanding of why states enter into alliances & why these alliances persist. However, we argue that extant tests of this model are improperly specified, greatly reducing t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International interactions 2004-10, Vol.30 (4), p.309-329 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The trade-off model of alliances offers a theory of alliance formation & duration that has significantly advanced our understanding of why states enter into alliances & why these alliances persist. However, we argue that extant tests of this model are improperly specified, greatly reducing the overall usefulness of the trade-off theory, & we therefore use this paper to bring foreign policy interests back into the model. Specifically, we argue that dyadic interest similarity best captures the motivations behind alliance formation & termination, & together with capability concentration, accurately predicts when dyads will seek alliances & what types of alliances are likely to be formed. We test our theory using a greatly expanded temporal domain (1648-2000), & our results are consistent & robust across each model. 4 Tables, 2 Figures, 21 References. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-0629 1547-7444 |
DOI: | 10.1080/03050620490883985 |