Prior Commitments: Compatible Interests versus Capabilities in Alliance Behavior

The trade-off model of alliances offers a theory of alliance formation & duration that has significantly advanced our understanding of why states enter into alliances & why these alliances persist. However, we argue that extant tests of this model are improperly specified, greatly reducing t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International interactions 2004-10, Vol.30 (4), p.309-329
Hauptverfasser: Gibler, Douglas, Rider, Toby
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The trade-off model of alliances offers a theory of alliance formation & duration that has significantly advanced our understanding of why states enter into alliances & why these alliances persist. However, we argue that extant tests of this model are improperly specified, greatly reducing the overall usefulness of the trade-off theory, & we therefore use this paper to bring foreign policy interests back into the model. Specifically, we argue that dyadic interest similarity best captures the motivations behind alliance formation & termination, & together with capability concentration, accurately predicts when dyads will seek alliances & what types of alliances are likely to be formed. We test our theory using a greatly expanded temporal domain (1648-2000), & our results are consistent & robust across each model. 4 Tables, 2 Figures, 21 References. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:0305-0629
1547-7444
DOI:10.1080/03050620490883985