Risk factors for symptomatic and asymptomatic chikungunya infection

Background In 2008, a chikungunya epidemic occurred in Southern Thailand. In many epidemics, there is a sizable number of asymptomatic cases. It is uncertain whether symptomatic and asymptomatic cases share the same risk factors. Methods Residents aged 18 years or more from three villages were sampl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2013-12, Vol.107 (12), p.789-796
Hauptverfasser: Nakkhara, Phatchani, Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi, Thammapalo, Suwich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In 2008, a chikungunya epidemic occurred in Southern Thailand. In many epidemics, there is a sizable number of asymptomatic cases. It is uncertain whether symptomatic and asymptomatic cases share the same risk factors. Methods Residents aged 18 years or more from three villages were sampled, their venous blood tested for anti-chikungunya virus IgG (haemagglutination-inhibition [HI] technique), and a face-to-face interview conducted during a home visit. Results Of 507 subjects selected, 314 (61.9%) were seropositive (HI titre≥1:10), of whom 148 (47.1%) were asymptomatic. Among subjects who reported fever and joint pain during the epidemic, 166 (97.1%) still had a positive titre. Having a garbage pile nearby and spending at least eight hours per day outdoors were associated with an increased risk of both symptomatic and asymptomatic chikungunya infection. Protective factors for symptomatic infection were age more than 58 and having a high level of formal education. Conclusions Transmission was determined by environmental conditions whereas symptoms were associated with personal biological factors and social setting.
ISSN:0035-9203
1878-3503
DOI:10.1093/trstmh/trt083