Lithium usage and renal function testing in a large UK community population; a case–control study
Abstract Objective This study investigates the prevalence of lithium use, monitoring practice and associated effects on renal function in a large UK community sample. Method A large population-based renal function database was cross-referenced with a general practitioner database of 404,673 patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | General hospital psychiatry 2013-11, Vol.35 (6), p.631-635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective This study investigates the prevalence of lithium use, monitoring practice and associated effects on renal function in a large UK community sample. Method A large population-based renal function database was cross-referenced with a general practitioner database of 404,673 patients. The renal function of patients prescribed lithium during the 2-year period was compared with that of matched controls. The renal monitoring patterns of these cases were investigated in a naturalistic observational study. Data underwent parametric testing — continuous variables by analysis of variance, with appropriate adjustment, and categorical outcomes by χ2 testing. Block analysis of variance was undertaken on case–control data. Results A total of 422 patients in the database were prescribed lithium. Renal function monitoring in accordance with published guidelines occurred in 69% of patients. Patients taking lithium had a significantly higher serum creatinine (5.8 μmol/L, P < .001) and lower glomerular filtration rate (5.9 ml/min, P < .001) when compared to matched controls. Conclusions This is the first study carried out in a large community sample. Lithium remains widely prescribed in the community setting. The study confirms that lithium has a statistically and clinically significant negative effect on renal function. Despite published guidelines and recognition of the importance of serial measurements, monitoring of renal function is inconsistent. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0163-8343 1873-7714 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.10.016 |