Rapid response teams, do not resuscitate orders, and potential opportunities to improve end-of-life care: a multicentre retrospective study

Abstract Purpose Rapid response teams (RRTs) were created to stabilize acutely ill patients on the ward, but recent studies suggest that RRTs may improve end-of-life care (EOLC). To learn more about the role of the RRT in EOLC at our institutions, we conducted a retrospective review. Methods Retrosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of critical care 2013-08, Vol.28 (4), p.498-503
Hauptverfasser: Downar, James, MDCM, MHSc, FRCPC, Rodin, Danielle, MD, Barua, Reeta, Lejnieks, Brandon, Gudimella, Rakesh, BHSc (H), McCredie, Victoria, MBChB MRCP(UK), Hayes, Chris, MD, MSc, MEd, FRCPC, Steel, Andrew, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCA, FRCPC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose Rapid response teams (RRTs) were created to stabilize acutely ill patients on the ward, but recent studies suggest that RRTs may improve end-of-life care (EOLC). To learn more about the role of the RRT in EOLC at our institutions, we conducted a retrospective review. Methods Retrospective review of 300 RRT consultations at 3 academic hospitals in Toronto, Canada. Results The typical consultation was for an elderly patient with chronic illness. More than 90% had a “full resuscitation” order at the time of consultation. One third were admitted to the intensive care unit within 48 hours of the RRT consultation, and 24.7% ultimately died. Twenty-seven (9.3%) had a patient/family conference on the ward within 48h of the RRT consultation, 24 (8.3%) of whom changed their resuscitation order as a result. Among those who changed their resuscitation order, fewer than 20% were referred to the palliative care or spiritual care service, or prescribed comfort medications as needed ( pro re nata ), within 48h of the RRT consultation; 2 patients died without receiving any common EOLC orders, and 15 (63%) died before discharge. Conclusions RRT consultation is an important milestone for many patients approaching EOL. RRTs frequently participate in EOL discussions and decision-making, but they may miss opportunities to facilitate EOLC.
ISSN:0883-9441
1557-8615
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.002