Do stable environments select against phenotypic plasticity in hermaphroditic sex allocation?

Phenotypic plasticity is the environment-induced change in the phenotype of an organism. Natural selection operates for the ability of individuals to adjust their phenotype to the current environmental conditions when environmental conditions fluctuate. Simultaneous hermaphrodites may exhibit plasti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European zoological journal 2013-09, Vol.80 (3), p.358-363
Hauptverfasser: Schleicherová, D., Sella, G., Lorenzi, M. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Phenotypic plasticity is the environment-induced change in the phenotype of an organism. Natural selection operates for the ability of individuals to adjust their phenotype to the current environmental conditions when environmental conditions fluctuate. Simultaneous hermaphrodites may exhibit plasticity in sex allocation according to the availability of mates at any particular time. The plasticity in sex allocation has probably evolved under fluctuating mating opportunities, which are usually low but increase when hermaphrodites incur sudden demographic expansion. Here we compare the plasticity in sex allocation in two different populations of the hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema - a laboratory population and a wild one. Worms from the laboratory population were kept under constant crowded conditions for about 200 generations (i.e. they were exposed to high mating opportunities). Worms from the wild population were kept under crowded conditions for 20 generations only. Worms from the laboratory population showed significantly less plasticity in sex allocation than worms from the wild population. Although we cannot rule out the hypotheses that genetic drift or local adaptation played a role in the differences between the two populations, the most likely explanation for our results is that worms of the laboratory population underwent a loss of plasticity in sex allocation because they were kept under constant mating opportunities. In fact, the sensory and regulatory machinery that worms use for exhibiting plastic sex allocation responses is likely to be the same as the machinery that is required for mate searching and sex role synchronization between mating partners. The need to maintain this machinery can explain why worms from the laboratory population diminished their plasticity in sex allocation but did not lose it completely. Therefore our results give some clues as to how plasticity in sex allocation evolves or is constrained.
ISSN:1125-0003
2475-0255
1748-5851
2475-0263
DOI:10.1080/11250003.2013.805826