HPV self‐sampling or the Pap‐smear: A randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France

Today in France, low attendance to cervical screening by Papanicolaou cytology (Pap‐smear) is a major contributor to the 3,000 new cervical cancer cases and 1,000 deaths that occur from this disease every year. Nonattenders are mostly from lower socioeconomic groups and testing of self‐obtained samp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2013-12, Vol.133 (11), p.2681-2687
Hauptverfasser: Sancho‐Garnier, H., Tamalet, C., Halfon, P., Leandri, F.X., Retraite, L. Le, Djoufelkit, K., Heid, P., Davies, P., Piana, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Today in France, low attendance to cervical screening by Papanicolaou cytology (Pap‐smear) is a major contributor to the 3,000 new cervical cancer cases and 1,000 deaths that occur from this disease every year. Nonattenders are mostly from lower socioeconomic groups and testing of self‐obtained samples for high‐risk Human Papilloma virus (HPV) types has been proposed as a method to increase screening participation in these groups. In 2011, we conducted a randomized study of women aged 35–69 from very low‐income populations around Marseille who had not responded to an initial invitation for a free Pap‐smear. After randomization, one group received a second invitation for a free Pap‐smear and the other group was offered a free self‐sampling kit for HPV testing. Participation rates were significantly different between the two groups with only 2.0% of women attending for a Pap‐smear while 18.3% of women returned a self‐sample for HPV testing (p ≤ 0.001). The detection rate of high‐grade lesions (≥CIN2) was 0.2‰ in the Pap‐smear group and 1.25‰ in the self‐sampling group (p = 0.01). Offering self‐sampling increased participation rates while the use of HPV testing increased the detection of cervical lesions (≥CIN2) in comparison to the group of women receiving a second invitation for a Pap‐smear. However, low compliance to follow‐up in the self‐sampling group reduces the effectiveness of this screening approach in nonattenders women and must be carefully managed. What's new? Some women don't go in for regular Pap smears. One idea to screen this population for HPV is to have them collect their own vaginal specimens and send them in for testing. Far more women participated in this self‐sampling program than responded to an invitation for a free Pap smear. However, this study reports that even when they test positive for HPV, these women mostly don't go in for follow‐up, which lowers the effectiveness of the system.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/ijc.28283