Sensibility of the Stump in Adults With an Acquired Major Upper Extremity Amputation

Abstract Objectives To compare the sensibility of the stump in adults with an acquired major upper extremity amputation with the sensibility of the unaffected side and with the corresponding body parts of healthy controls, as well as to relate the sensibility of the stump to daily functioning. Desig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2013-11, Vol.94 (11), p.2179-2185
Hauptverfasser: van Gils, Willemijn, MD, Reinders-Messelink, Heleen A., MSc, PhD, Smit-Klaij, Frida, MD, PhD, Bongers, Raoul M., MSc, PhD, Dijkstra, Pieter U., PhD, van der Sluis, Corry K., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives To compare the sensibility of the stump in adults with an acquired major upper extremity amputation with the sensibility of the unaffected side and with the corresponding body parts of healthy controls, as well as to relate the sensibility of the stump to daily functioning. Design A survey with matched controls. Setting A tertiary referral center. Participants A referred sample of patients (n=30) with an acquired upper extremity amputation, at least 1 year after amputation, and control subjects (n=30) matched for age, sex, and hand dominance were evaluated. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Three different modalities of sensibility were measured: (1) touch-pressure sensibility, tested using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments; (2) stereognosis, detected using the Shape and Texture Identification test; and (3) kinesthesia. Daily functioning was assessed using the Upper Extremity Functional Status Module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey. Results The mean time ± SD since amputation was 20±17.8 years. Twenty patients used a prosthesis. The stump sensibility was similar to that of unaffected hands and tended to be less than that of unaffected arms ( P =.08). The patients using a prosthesis had significantly poorer touch-pressure sensibility in the stump compared with the nonusers ( P =.04). However, touch-pressure sensibility and stereognosis were worse in the patients than in controls ( P
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.025