Ancillary Outcome Measures for Assessment of Individuals With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN.Narrative review. OBJECTIVE.To identify suitable outcome measures that can be used to quantify neurological and functional impairment in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.CSM is the leading cause of acquired spinal cord disability, causi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2013-10, Vol.38 (22S Suppl 1), p.S111-S122
Hauptverfasser: Kalsi-Ryan, Sukhvinder, Singh, Anoushka, Massicotte, Eric M, Arnold, Paul M, Brodke, Darrel S, Norvell, Daniel C, Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T, Fehlings, Michael G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:STUDY DESIGN.Narrative review. OBJECTIVE.To identify suitable outcome measures that can be used to quantify neurological and functional impairment in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.CSM is the leading cause of acquired spinal cord disability, causing varying degrees of neurological impairment which impact on independence and quality of life. Because this impairment can have a heterogeneous presentation, a single outcome measure cannot define the broad range of deficits seen in this population. Therefore, it is necessary to define outcome measures that characterize the deficits with greater validity and sensitivity. METHODS.This review was conducted in 3 stages. Stage ITo evaluate the current use of outcome measures in CSM, PubMed was searched using the name of the outcome measure and the common abbreviation combined with “CSM” or “myelopathy.” Stage IIHaving identified a lack of appropriate outcome measures, we constructed criteria by which measures appropriate for assessing the various aspects of CSM could be identified. Stage IIIA second literature search was then conducted looking at specified outcomes that met these criteria. All literature was reviewed to determine specificity and psychometric properties of outcomes for CSM. RESULTS.Nurick grade, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36), and Neck Disability Index were the most commonly cited measures. The Short-Form 36 Health Survey and Myelopathy Disability Index have been validated in the CSM population with multiple studies, whereas the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale score, Nurick grade, and European Myelopathy Scale each had only one study assessing psychometric characteristics. No validity, reliability, or responsiveness studies were found for the VAS or Neck Disability Index in the CSM population. CONCLUSION.We recommend that the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale, Nurick grade, Myelopathy Disability Index, Neck Disability Index, and 30-Meter Walk Test are most appropriate for the assessment of CSM. However, 6 additional outcome measures (QuickDASH, Berg Balance Scale, Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension, Grip Dynamometer, and GAITRite Anlaysis) were identified, which provide complementary assessments for CSM.Summary Statements. There does not exist a single or composite of outcome instruments that mea
ISSN:0362-2436
1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f499