First In-Human Magnetic Resonance Visualization of Surgical Mesh Implants for Inguinal Hernia Treatment

OBJECTIVESUntil today, there have been no conventional imaging methods available to visualize surgical mesh implants and related complications. In a new approach, we incorporated iron particles into polymer-based implants and visualized them by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).After clinical approval of such implants, the purposes of this study were to evaluate the MRI conspicuity of such iron-loaded mesh implants in patients treated for inguinal hernias and to assess the immediate postsurgical mesh configuration. MATERIALS AND METHODSApproved by the ethics committee, in this prospective cohort study, 13 patients (3 patients with bilateral hernia treatment) were surgically treated for inguinal hernia receiving iron-loaded mesh implants between March and October 2012. The implants were applied via laparoscopic technique (transabdominal preperitoneal technique; n = 8, 3 patients with bilateral hernia treatment) or via open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein surgery; n = 5). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 day after the surgery at a 1.5-T scanner (Achieva; Philips, Best, The Netherlands) with a 16-channel receiver coil using 3 different gradient echo sequences (first gradient echo sequence, second gradient echo sequence, and third gradient echo sequence [GRE1-3]) and 1 T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence (T2wTSE). Three radiologists independently evaluated mesh conspicuity and diagnostic value with respect to different structures using a semiquantitative scoring system (1, insufficient; 2, sufficient; 3, good; 4, optimal). Mesh deformation and coverage of the hernia were visually assessed and rated using a 5-point semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed models and linear contrast. RESULTSAll 16 implants were successfully visualized by MRI. On gradient echo sequences, the mesh is clearly delineated as a thick hypointense line. On T2wTSE, the mesh was depicted as a faint hypointense line, which was difficult to identify. The first gradient echo sequence was rated best for visual conspicuity (mean [SD], 3.8 [0.4]). T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence was preferred for evaluation of the surrounding anatomy (mean [SD], 3.7 [0.3]). For the combined assessment of both mesh and anatomy, GRE3 was rated best (mean [SD], 2.9 [0.7]). Local air slightly reduced mesh delineation (lowest mean [SD] rating, 2.9 [0.7] for GRE3). Overall, in both implantation techniques, the meshes exhibited mild to moderate deformations (mean