Secondary structure prediction for complete rDNA sequences (18S, 5.8S, and 28S rDNA) of Demodex folliculorum, and comparison of divergent domains structures across Acari

•Secondary structure prediction of Demodex folliculorum complete rDNA sequence.•First model of rDNA complete sequence in Acari.•Comparison of secondary structures of 18S rDNA V1–V9 in Acari.•Comparison of secondary structures of 28S rDNA D1–D12 in Acari. According to base pairing, the rRNA folds int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental parasitology 2013-10, Vol.135 (2), p.370-381
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Ya-E., Wang, Zheng-Hang, Xu, Yang, Wu, Li-Ping, Hu, Li
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Secondary structure prediction of Demodex folliculorum complete rDNA sequence.•First model of rDNA complete sequence in Acari.•Comparison of secondary structures of 18S rDNA V1–V9 in Acari.•Comparison of secondary structures of 28S rDNA D1–D12 in Acari. According to base pairing, the rRNA folds into corresponding secondary structures, which contain additional phylogenetic information. On the basis of sequencing for complete rDNA sequences (18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and 28S rDNA) of Demodex, we predicted the secondary structure of the complete rDNA sequence (18S, 5.8S, and 28S rDNA) of Demodex folliculorum, which was in concordance with that of the main arthropod lineages in past studies. And together with the sequence data from GenBank, we also predicted the secondary structures of divergent domains in SSU rRNA of 51 species and in LSU rRNA of 43 species from four superfamilies in Acari (Cheyletoidea, Tetranychoidea, Analgoidea and Ixodoidea). The multiple alignment among the four superfamilies in Acari showed that, insertions from Tetranychoidea SSU rRNA formed two newly proposed helixes, and helix c3-2b of LSU rRNA was absent in Demodex (Cheyletoidea) taxa. Generally speaking, LSU rRNA presented more remarkable differences than SSU rRNA did, mainly in D2, D3, D5, D7a, D7b, D8 and D10.
ISSN:0014-4894
1090-2449
DOI:10.1016/j.exppara.2013.07.025