Prospective, Randomized, Blinded, Comparative Study of Injectable Micronized Dehydrated Amniotic/Chorionic Membrane Allograft for Plantar Fasciitis—A Feasibility Study
Background: Specialized treatment of plantar fasciitis that can reduce inflammation and promote healing may be a possible alternative prior to surgical intervention. We report the results of a randomized clinical trial examining the efficacy of micronized dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Foot & ankle international 2013-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1332-1339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Specialized treatment of plantar fasciitis that can reduce inflammation and promote healing may
be a possible alternative prior to surgical intervention. We report the results of a randomized
clinical trial examining the efficacy of micronized dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane
(mDHACM) injection as a treatment for chronic refractory plantar fasciitis.
Methods:
An institutional review board–approved, prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial was
performed. Forty-five patients were randomized to receive injection of 2 cc 0.5% Marcaine plain,
then either 1.25 cc saline (controls), 0.5 cc mDHACM, or 1.25 cc mDHACM. Follow-up visits occurred
over 8 weeks to measure function, pain, and functional health and well-being.
Results:
Significant improvement in plantar fasciitis symptoms was observed in patients receiving 0.5 cc
or 1.25 cc mDHACM versus controls within 1 week of treatment and throughout the study period. At 1
week, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot scores increased by a mean of 2.2
± 17.4 points for controls versus 38.7 ± 11.4 points for those receiving 0.5 cc mDHACM
(P < .001) and 33.7 ± 14.0 points for those receiving 1.25 cc mDHACM
(P < .001). By week 8 AOFAS Hindfoot scores increased by a mean of 12.9 ± 16.9
points for controls versus 51.6 ± 10.1 and 53.3 ± 9.4 for those receiving 0.5 cc and 1.25 cc mDHACM,
respectively (both P < .001). No significant difference in treatment response
was observed in patients receiving 0.5 cc versus 1.25 cc mDHACM.
Conclusion:
In patients with refractory plantar fasciitis, mDHACM is a viable treatment option. Larger
studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Level of Evidence:
Level I, prospective randomized study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1071-1007 1944-7876 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1071100713502179 |