The Effect of Solidification Dynamics on the Formation of the Skin in Die Cast Mg-Al and Mg-RE Alloys

The grain microstructures and hardness of the surface layers of a Mg–RE alloy (3.44 mass % La) and two Mg–Al alloys, (8.77 and 11.6 mass % Al), are compared. All three alloys exhibit a harder surface layer, or skin, with fine primary α (Mg) grains, and a softer core with a larger grain size due to t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advanced engineering materials 2013-04, Vol.15 (4), p.302-307
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Kun Vanna, Easton, Mark A., Cáceres, Carlos H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The grain microstructures and hardness of the surface layers of a Mg–RE alloy (3.44 mass % La) and two Mg–Al alloys, (8.77 and 11.6 mass % Al), are compared. All three alloys exhibit a harder surface layer, or skin, with fine primary α (Mg) grains, and a softer core with a larger grain size due to the prevalence of externally solidified grains (ESGs), but the skin of the RE alloy is more continuous and uniform due to the relative absence of ESGs. The distribution of ESGs can be related to the rheology of the liquid–solid mixtures inside the die: the solid fraction in the RE alloy, for given drop in temperature, is much larger than for the Mg–Al alloys. Being more viscous, the liquid in the RE alloy prevents the migration of ESGs towards the surface, hence the more uniform and tightly packed grain microstructure and better defined skin. The Mg–La alloy evolves more solid for given temperature drop than the Mg–Al alloys, i.e., the incipient grain microstructure (black) forms a better‐defined solid front in the Mg–RE alloy. The large (red) crystals pre‐solidified in the shot‐sleeve find it more difficult to reach the surface in the Mg‐RE alloy than those facing the more mushy solidification front of the Mg–Al alloys. A more distinct skin layer in the Mg–La alloy results.
ISSN:1438-1656
1527-2648
DOI:10.1002/adem.201200188