Effect of filler-elastomer interactions on the mechanical and nonlinear viscoelastic behaviors of chemically modified silica-reinforced solution-polymerized styrene butadiene rubber

We explore the effects of surface modification of silica on mechanical and nonlinear viscoelastic behaviors of solution‐polymerized styrene butadiene rubber (SSBR) filled by modified silica (M‐Silica). Compared with pristine silica‐filled SSBR, SSBR reinforced by M‐Silica presents not only better fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied polymer science 2012-10, Vol.126 (1), p.116-126
Hauptverfasser: Qu, Liangliang, Yu, Guozhu, Wang, Lili, Li, Chuanqing, Zhao, Qingsong, Li, Jing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We explore the effects of surface modification of silica on mechanical and nonlinear viscoelastic behaviors of solution‐polymerized styrene butadiene rubber (SSBR) filled by modified silica (M‐Silica). Compared with pristine silica‐filled SSBR, SSBR reinforced by M‐Silica presents not only better filler dispersity and mechanical properties but also lower internal friction in the certain temperature range. The cure kinetics was investigated in term of curemeter, and the kinetics parameters of SSBR/M‐Silica were found to vary from those of SSBR with pristine silica, indicating that silane coupling agent molecules grafted on the silica surface provoked an enhanced mobility of rubber chain adsorbed onto filler surface and then decreased the barrier of crosslink reaction. Analysis using tube model theory provided more evidence for the reinforcement effect of M‐Silica. SSBR containing M‐Silica exhibited a combination of increments in topological tube‐like constraints and crosslink density in comparison with SSBR filled with pristine silica. Strain dependence of dynamic modulus revealed that the secondary network formed by silica particles was destroyed to some extent with the increase of the hydrophobic character of silica surface. Loss factor of SSBR/M‐Silica was dominated by different mechanism in different temperature range, i.e., secondary filler network at glass transition temperature and rubber–filler interaction and entangled structure above room temperature. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012
ISSN:0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI:10.1002/app.36677