Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance
•We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Tea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2013-09, Vol.122 (1), p.12-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Organizational behavior and human decision processes |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Nahrgang, Jennifer D. DeRue, D. Scott Hollenbeck, John R. Spitzmuller, Matthias Jundt, Dustin K. Ilgen, Daniel R. |
description | •We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Team coordination mediated the goal-performance relationship.
This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general “do your best” learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general “do your best” learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general “do your best” learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1437965647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749597813000423</els_id><sourcerecordid>1437965647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-922a2ad43dbaf929b19062a8570e77950068c569dd1c730f0f7cb80c466b2e2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouH78BV4CXry0TtI2aQQPsvgFC170akjTqWbZNjXpCv73Zl1PexBhYC6_N7x5j5AzBjkDJi6XuW_e2zHnwIoc0kC9R2YMVJUpxWGfzECWKquUrA_JUYxLAMYEwIy83nuzohGnyQ1v1A10QtPHK_r8jtT1o7ET9R1doQnDBjBDS0cMnQ-9GSzSt6SO1A90DN5ijLvACTnoEoGnv_uYvNzdPs8fssXT_eP8ZpHZsmJTpjg33LRl0TamU1w1TIHgpq4koJSqAhC1rYRqW2ZlAR100jY12FKIhiM3xTG52N5NPj7WGCfdu2hxtTID-nXUrCykEpUo5X9QYHVyxBN6voMu_ToM6RHNCqWqZI9BoootZYOPMWCnx-B6E740A72pRy_1Tz16U4-GNFAn1fVWhSmWT4dBR-swRda6gHbSrXd_6r8BD2aYHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399557010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nahrgang, Jennifer D. ; DeRue, D. Scott ; Hollenbeck, John R. ; Spitzmuller, Matthias ; Jundt, Dustin K. ; Ilgen, Daniel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nahrgang, Jennifer D. ; DeRue, D. Scott ; Hollenbeck, John R. ; Spitzmuller, Matthias ; Jundt, Dustin K. ; Ilgen, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><description>•We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Team coordination mediated the goal-performance relationship.
This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general “do your best” learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general “do your best” learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general “do your best” learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBDPFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Goal setting ; Goals ; Group dynamics ; Group functioning ; Human performance ; Learning ; Organizational behaviour ; Organizational goals ; Organizational learning ; Simulation ; Specific performance ; Studies ; Task complexity ; Team performance ; Team processes ; Teams ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2013-09, Vol.122 (1), p.12-21</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Sep 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-922a2ad43dbaf929b19062a8570e77950068c569dd1c730f0f7cb80c466b2e2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-922a2ad43dbaf929b19062a8570e77950068c569dd1c730f0f7cb80c466b2e2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,31000,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nahrgang, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRue, D. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenbeck, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzmuller, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jundt, Dustin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilgen, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>•We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Team coordination mediated the goal-performance relationship.
This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general “do your best” learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general “do your best” learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general “do your best” learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.</description><subject>Goal setting</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Group functioning</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Organizational goals</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Specific performance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task complexity</subject><subject>Team performance</subject><subject>Team processes</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouH78BV4CXry0TtI2aQQPsvgFC170akjTqWbZNjXpCv73Zl1PexBhYC6_N7x5j5AzBjkDJi6XuW_e2zHnwIoc0kC9R2YMVJUpxWGfzECWKquUrA_JUYxLAMYEwIy83nuzohGnyQ1v1A10QtPHK_r8jtT1o7ET9R1doQnDBjBDS0cMnQ-9GSzSt6SO1A90DN5ijLvACTnoEoGnv_uYvNzdPs8fssXT_eP8ZpHZsmJTpjg33LRl0TamU1w1TIHgpq4koJSqAhC1rYRqW2ZlAR100jY12FKIhiM3xTG52N5NPj7WGCfdu2hxtTID-nXUrCykEpUo5X9QYHVyxBN6voMu_ToM6RHNCqWqZI9BoootZYOPMWCnx-B6E740A72pRy_1Tz16U4-GNFAn1fVWhSmWT4dBR-swRda6gHbSrXd_6r8BD2aYHA</recordid><startdate>201309</startdate><enddate>201309</enddate><creator>Nahrgang, Jennifer D.</creator><creator>DeRue, D. Scott</creator><creator>Hollenbeck, John R.</creator><creator>Spitzmuller, Matthias</creator><creator>Jundt, Dustin K.</creator><creator>Ilgen, Daniel R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201309</creationdate><title>Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance</title><author>Nahrgang, Jennifer D. ; DeRue, D. Scott ; Hollenbeck, John R. ; Spitzmuller, Matthias ; Jundt, Dustin K. ; Ilgen, Daniel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-922a2ad43dbaf929b19062a8570e77950068c569dd1c730f0f7cb80c466b2e2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Goal setting</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Group functioning</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Organizational goals</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Specific performance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task complexity</topic><topic>Team performance</topic><topic>Team processes</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nahrgang, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeRue, D. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenbeck, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzmuller, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jundt, Dustin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilgen, Daniel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nahrgang, Jennifer D.</au><au>DeRue, D. Scott</au><au>Hollenbeck, John R.</au><au>Spitzmuller, Matthias</au><au>Jundt, Dustin K.</au><au>Ilgen, Daniel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2013-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>12-21</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><coden>OBDPFO</coden><abstract>•We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Team coordination mediated the goal-performance relationship.
This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general “do your best” learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general “do your best” learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general “do your best” learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-5978 |
ispartof | Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2013-09, Vol.122 (1), p.12-21 |
issn | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1437965647 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Goal setting Goals Group dynamics Group functioning Human performance Learning Organizational behaviour Organizational goals Organizational learning Simulation Specific performance Studies Task complexity Team performance Team processes Teams Teamwork |
title | Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goal%20setting%20in%20teams:%20The%20impact%20of%20learning%20and%20performance%20goals%20on%20process%20and%20performance&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Nahrgang,%20Jennifer%20D.&rft.date=2013-09&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=12-21&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft.coden=OBDPFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1437965647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399557010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0749597813000423&rfr_iscdi=true |