Goal setting in teams: The impact of learning and performance goals on process and performance

•We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Tea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2013-09, Vol.122 (1), p.12-21
Hauptverfasser: Nahrgang, Jennifer D., DeRue, D. Scott, Hollenbeck, John R., Spitzmuller, Matthias, Jundt, Dustin K., Ilgen, Daniel R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We examine the impact of three alternative types of goals on team performance.•Specific learning goals performed worse than general learning goals.•Specific learning goals performed worse than specific performance goals.•Task complexity amplified the negative effects of specific learning goals.•Team coordination mediated the goal-performance relationship. This study examined the impact of three alternative types of goals (specific learning, general “do your best” learning, and specific performance) on team performance. Eighty-four-person teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulation in which the team goal and task complexity were manipulated. Contrary to research at the individual level, teams with specific learning goals performed worse than did teams with general “do your best” learning goals or specific performance goals. The negative effects of specific learning goals relative to general “do your best” learning goals and specific performance goals were amplified under conditions of increased task complexity and were explained by the amount of coordination in the teams.
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.008