Added value of trabecular bone score to bone mineral density for prediction of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women: The OPUS study

Abstract The objective of this study was to consider whether trabecular bone score (TBS) improves on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurement alone for the prediction of incident fractures in postmenopausal women. Patients and methods The OPUS study was conducted in ambulatory European women ag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-11, Vol.57 (1), p.232-236
Hauptverfasser: Briot, Karine, Paternotte, Simon, Kolta, Sami, Eastell, Richard, Reid, David M, Felsenberg, Dieter, Glüer, Claus C, Roux, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The objective of this study was to consider whether trabecular bone score (TBS) improves on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurement alone for the prediction of incident fractures in postmenopausal women. Patients and methods The OPUS study was conducted in ambulatory European women aged above 55 years, recruited in 5 centers followed over 6 years. For the assessment of the performance of TBS, baseline Hologic scans from 3 centers (Kiel, Paris and Sheffield) were available. Follow-up for incident fractures was available for 1007 women (mean age 65.9 ± 6.9 years). We compared the performance of TBS, aBMD, and their combination, by using net reclassification improvement (NRI, primary analysis) and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) c-statistical analysis with ORs and areas under the curves (AUCs) (secondary analyses). Results 82 (8.1%) subjects with incident clinical osteoporotic fractures, and 46 (4.6%) with incident radiographic vertebral fractures were recorded over 6 years. Performance of TBS was significantly better than lumbar spine (LS) aBMD for the prediction of incident clinical osteoporotic fractures (NRI = 16.3%, p = 0.007). For radiographic vertebral fractures, TBS and LS aBMD had similar predictive power but the combination of TBS and LS aBMD increased the performance over LS aBMD alone (NRI = 8.6%, p = 0.046) but the prediction is similar to hip and femoral neck aBMD. In non osteoporotic women, TBS predicted incident fragility fractures similarly to LS aBMD. Conclusions This prospective study shows that in general population, TBS is a useful tool to improve the performance of lumbar spine aBMD for vertebral osteoporotic fractures.
ISSN:8756-3282
1873-2763
DOI:10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.040