Prevalence of remission and recovery in schizophrenia in the Czech Republic
Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to map the point prevalence of remission and recovery in patients with schizophrenia in the Czech Republic. Method The point-symptomatic remission criteria were based on the definition of remission in schizophrenia according to Andreasen, without the time...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comprehensive psychiatry 2013-10, Vol.54 (7), p.1111-1116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to map the point prevalence of remission and recovery in patients with schizophrenia in the Czech Republic. Method The point-symptomatic remission criteria were based on the definition of remission in schizophrenia according to Andreasen, without the time criterion. The definition of complete remission contained, in addition to the point-symptomatic remission criteria, a time aspect which was determined by the absence of psychiatric hospitalisation or a change in antipsychotic medications due to inefficiency in the preceding six months. Functional remission was defined by a total score on the PSP scale in the range between 71 and 100 points. Recovery was defined by the simultaneous fulfilment of the criteria for complete and functional remission. Results A total of 481 patients with schizophrenia were included in the study. The point-symptomatic remission criteria were fulfilled in a total of 258 patients (54%); complete remission occurred in a total of 214 patients (44%). Functional remission was reached by 124 patients (26%) in total. Recovery was proven in a total of 91 patients (19%). Conclusion The ascertained data are in accordance with the results of methodologically similar studies and confirm the known trajectories of the course of schizophrenia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-440X 1532-8384 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.006 |