A novel cell-processing method ‘AgarCytos’ in conjunction with OCT3/4 and PLAP to detect intratubular germ cell neoplasia in non-obstructive azoospermia using remnants of testicular sperm extraction specimens

STUDY QUESTION Can we diagnose intratubular germ cell neoplasia (IGCN) using the immunohistochemical markers placental-like alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) and OCT3/4 using a novel cell-processing method ‘AgarCytos’, applied to the remnants of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) specimens and what is the prevalence of a testicular germ cell (pre)malignancy in men with a non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing TESE for fertility treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER IGCN can be successfully detected by immunohistochemical evaluation of AgarCytos, made of the remnants of TESE biopsies. The observed prevalence of a germ cell (pre)malignancy in this specific population was found to be 4.4%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Infertile men are at higher risk for testicular cancer than the general population. IGCN can be detected by immunohistochemistry using PLAP and OCT3/4 in standard testicular biopsies and, with less accuracy, in semen. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Between January 2011 and April 2012 a prospective cohort study was conducted at a Dutch tertiary care academic training hospital. All males with NOA (n = 182) undergoing a urological work-up followed by a diagnostic TESE for fertility treatment (n = 251) were included. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS After cryopreservation of sperm, if present, an AgarCyto was made of the remnants of the TESE biopsies. Sections were stained with haematoxylin–eosin for pathological examination as well as PLAP and OCT3/4 for immunohistochemistry to detect IGCN. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Eight men (4.4%) were diagnosed with a germ cell (pre)malignancy: six of them had seminoma, two without and four with concomitant IGCN, and two of them had IGCN only. Microscopic evaluation including immunohistochemical analysis of the AgarCytos diagnosed three (1.6%) more cases of a germ cell (pre)malignancy compared with scrotal ultrasound alone (one case of bilateral seminoma with concomitant IGCN and two cases of IGCN alone). No false-positive cytology results were found upon conventional histological evaluation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The main limitation of this study is lack of a simultaneously taken standard testicular biopsy, to compare the results of our novel diagnostic method with. Nevertheless, in all but one of our cases orchidectomy followed and the diagnosis was confirmed by histology. In the remaining case repeat TESE showed similar results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Simultaneous screening for IGCN is highly recomm