Plasma phospholipid fatty acids, dietary fatty acids and prostate cancer risk

Animal and experimental studies have demonstrated that long‐chain n‐3 fatty acids inhibit the development of prostate cancer, whereas n‐6 fatty acids might promote it. We performed a case–cohort analysis within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study using a random sample of 1,717 men and 464 prost...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2013-10, Vol.133 (8), p.1882-1891
Hauptverfasser: Bassett, Julie K., Severi, Gianluca, Hodge, Allison M., MacInnis, Robert J., Gibson, Robert A., Hopper, John L., English, Dallas R., Giles, Graham G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Animal and experimental studies have demonstrated that long‐chain n‐3 fatty acids inhibit the development of prostate cancer, whereas n‐6 fatty acids might promote it. We performed a case–cohort analysis within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study using a random sample of 1,717 men and 464 prostate cancer cases to investigate associations between fatty acids assessed in plasma phospholipids (PPLs) or diet (estimated using a 121‐item food frequency questionnaire) and prostate cancer risk. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. Prostate cancer risk was positively associated with %PPL saturated fatty acids (SFAs); HR [95% CI] = 1.51 [1.06, 2.16] (Q5 vs. Q1, fifth vs. first quintile); p‐trend = 0.003. HRs (Q5 to Q2 vs. Q1) were significantly elevated for %PPL palmitic acid. %PPL oleic acid was inversely associated with risk, HR = 0.62 [0.43, 0.91] (Q5 vs. Q1); p‐trend = 0.04. No statistically significant linear trends were observed for dietary intakes. The HRs were elevated for moderate intakes of linoleic acid (Q2 and Q3 vs. Q1, 1.58 [1.10, 2.28] and 1.70 [1.18, 2.46], respectively), but the increase was not significant for higher intakes (Q4 and Q5). No association varied significantly by tumour aggressiveness (all p‐homogeneity > 0.1). Prostate cancer risk was positively associated with %PPL SFA, largely attributable to palmitic acid and inversely associated with %PPL monounsaturated fatty acids, largely attributable to oleic acid. Higher risks were also observed for dietary n‐6 polyunsaturated fats, primarily linoleic acid. What's new? Animal and experimental studies have demonstrated that long'chain n'3 fatty acids inhibit the development of prostate cancer, whereas n'6 fatty acids might promote it. Whether similar associations exist for humans, however, has been unclear. This analysis of data from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study suggests that dietary intake of the n'6 linoleic acid and percentage of saturated fatty acid in plasma phospholipids are positively associated with prostate cancer risk. In addition, a higher percentage of n'9 oleic acid in plasma phospholipids was found to possibly reduce prostate cancer risk.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/ijc.28203