Physiological Determinants of the Cycling Time Trial
ABSTRACTStøren, Ø, Ulevåg, K, Larsen, MH, Støa, EM, and Helgerud, J. Physiological determinants of the cycling time trial. J Strength Cond Res 27(9)2366–2373, 2013—The purpose of this study was to examine the physiological determinants of endurance cycling time trial (TT) performance in a heterogene...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2013-09, Vol.27 (9), p.2366-2373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACTStøren, Ø, Ulevåg, K, Larsen, MH, Støa, EM, and Helgerud, J. Physiological determinants of the cycling time trial. J Strength Cond Res 27(9)2366–2373, 2013—The purpose of this study was to examine the physiological determinants of endurance cycling time trial (TT) performance in a heterogeneous group of competitive male road cyclists. About 15 male cyclists who had all competed in cycling the preceding season were tested for the anthropometric variables height, body weight, leg length, ankle circumference, and body fat percentage. They were also tested for maximal oxygen consumption (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), lactate threshold (LT), metabolic cost of cycling (CC), peak power output and average power output during a 30-second Wingate test, 1 repetition maximum and peak power in half squats, and a TT test on an ergometer. Heart rate and cadence (rounds per minute, RPM) were continuously measured during all cycle tests. Pearson Bivariate correlation tests and single linear regression tests were performed to obtain correlation coefficients (r), effect size (F), standard error of estimate (SEE), and 95% confidence interval. The single variable that correlated best with TT performance was power output at LT (r = 0.86, p < 0.01). Standard error of estimate was 7.5%. Lactate threshold expressed in %V[Combining Dot Above]O2max did not correlate significantly with TT performance. An equation representing both aerobic and anaerobic endurance capacity TT(w) = 0.95 ([V[Combining Dot Above]O2max/CC] TT%V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) + 0.05 (Wingate average) correlated strongly with TT laboratory performance (r = 0.93, p < 0.01, SEE = 5.7%). None of the strength, power, or anthropometric variables correlated significantly with TT laboratory performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
DOI: | 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827f5427 |