Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator: Effects on shoulder function

Abstract Background Subcutaneous almost substituted subpectoral approach of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation as a less invasive surgical technique. However, the impact of this change in placement site on procedure-related shoulder impairment is poorly understood. Methods Can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2013-09, Vol.168 (1), p.294-299
Hauptverfasser: Diemberger, Igor, Pegreffi, Francesco, Mazzotti, Andrea, Foschi, Elia, Martignani, Cristian, Belli, Guido, Biffi, Mauro, Ziacchi, Matteo, Branzi, Angelo, Grigioni, Francesco, Maietta Latessa, Pasqualino, Porcellini, Giuseppe, Tentoni, Claudio, Boriani, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Subcutaneous almost substituted subpectoral approach of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation as a less invasive surgical technique. However, the impact of this change in placement site on procedure-related shoulder impairment is poorly understood. Methods Candidates for ICD implantation were prospectively evaluated at baseline, 2-weeks and 3-months after the procedure. Assessment of shoulder function included: Constant Score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring method. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was adopted for quality of life. Results Fifty consecutive patients were enrolled (21 single-chamber, 5 dual-chamber and 24 biventricular ICD). Significant changes in the short term were observed: physical component summary (regarding SF-36) decreased from 44.5 ± 9.1 to 41.8 ± 11.4 (p = 0.016), patients with NRS > 1 increased from 14% to 44% (p < 0.001), DASH score increased from 1.29 [interquartile range 0.00–10.34] to 30.60 [interquartile range 12.93–46.34] (p < 0.001). Notably, only the shoulder ipsilateral to implantation site presented a decrease in Constant Score (76.00 [interquartile range 61.37–86.87] vs. 95.75 [interquartile range 91.37–98.00]; p < 0.001). After three months most of the parameters seemed to have recovered, except for range of motion. Procedure-related increase in pain (i.e. NRS increase ≥ 1 point) was the most important independent predictor of shoulder impairment, in terms of Constant Score modification (r = 0.570; p < 0.001). Conclusions ICD implantation is frequently associated with ipsilateral shoulder impairment which tends to recover within 3-months. These data positively compare with the subpectoral approach and should be considered for future research regarding impact of ICD implant on physical well-being and quality of life.
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.071