Moderating factors of video-modeling with other as model: A meta-analysis of single-case studies

► We use nonparametric meta-analytic techniques to examine the effectiveness of video-based modeling with other as model (VMO) for participants with disabilities. ► We examine if variations in magnitude of change are present for participant characteristics including primary disability and age. ► We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in developmental disabilities 2012-07, Vol.33 (4), p.1076-1086
Hauptverfasser: Mason, Rose A., Ganz, Jennifer B., Parker, Richard I., Burke, Mack D., Camargo, Siglia P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We use nonparametric meta-analytic techniques to examine the effectiveness of video-based modeling with other as model (VMO) for participants with disabilities. ► We examine if variations in magnitude of change are present for participant characteristics including primary disability and age. ► We examine differential effects of video modeling for targeted outcomes. ► VMO is an evidence-based practice for participants with ASD across ages and targeted outcomes. ► Even with smaller effects, such as those found for participants with developmental disabilities, VMO may still be considered due to minimal resource expenditure. Video modeling with other as model (VMO) is a more practical method for implementing video-based modeling techniques, such as video self-modeling, which requires significantly more editing. Despite this, identification of contextual factors such as participant characteristics and targeted outcomes that moderate the effectiveness of VMO has not previously been explored. The purpose of this study was to meta-analytically evaluate the evidence base of VMO with individuals with disabilities to determine if participant characteristics and targeted outcomes moderate the effectiveness of the intervention. Findings indicate that VMO is highly effective for participants with autism spectrum disorder (IRD=.83) and moderately effective for participants with developmental disabilities (IRD=.68). However, differential effects are indicated across levels of moderators for diagnoses and targeted outcomes. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
ISSN:0891-4222
1873-3379
DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.016