Management of Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures With Multistage Buccal Mucosa Graft Reconstruction
Objective To describe the indications and outcomes of salvage urethral reconstruction using the combination of urethrectomy and buccal graft replacement. Materials and Methods We retrospectively identified 91 consecutive patients who had undergone multistage urethral reconstruction from 2003 to 2009...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2013-09, Vol.82 (3), p.718-723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective To describe the indications and outcomes of salvage urethral reconstruction using the combination of urethrectomy and buccal graft replacement. Materials and Methods We retrospectively identified 91 consecutive patients who had undergone multistage urethral reconstruction from 2003 to 2009. The demographic and surgical outcomes data, including the need for first stage revision, pre- and postoperative urine flow rates, and reconstruction failure was collected for all patients. Results Of the 91 patients, 51 (56%) subsequently underwent urethral tubularization, 17 (19%) were pending closure, and 23 (25%) had undergone the first stage only, with no plan for completion. The stricture etiology included hypospadias in 41 (45.1%), lichen sclerosus in 29 (31.9%), and a combination of the 2 in 10 (11%). Of the 91 patients, 54.9% had panurethral disease, with the remaining involving varying lengths of the anterior urethra. The mean follow-up was 15 months (range 12-69). A total of 17 patients (18.7%) required revision of their first stage, with 4 requiring ≥2 repairs. Seven patients (7.7%) required revision of their second stage, with 2 undergoing multiple revisions. The urine flow rates increased on average from 6.7 mL/s preoperatively to 21.5 mL/s postoperatively ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.081 |