Index event bias—a numerical example

Abstract Studies of determinants of recurrent disease often give unexpected results. In particular, well-established risk factors may seem not to have much influence on the recurrence risk. Recently, it has been argued that such paradoxical findings may be because of the bias caused by the selection...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2013-02, Vol.66 (2), p.192-196
Hauptverfasser: Smits, Luc J.M, van Kuijk, Sander M.J, Leffers, Pieter, Peeters, Louis L, Prins, Martin H, Sep, Simone J.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Studies of determinants of recurrent disease often give unexpected results. In particular, well-established risk factors may seem not to have much influence on the recurrence risk. Recently, it has been argued that such paradoxical findings may be because of the bias caused by the selection of patients based on the occurrence of an earlier episode of the disease. This bias was referred to as index event bias. Here, we give a theoretical quantitative example of index event bias, showing that, as a result of selection of patients on the basis of previous disease: (1) risk factors become inversely associated when they are not in the unselected population, and (2) the crude association between the risk factor of interest and disease becomes biased toward the null.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.023