Effects of magnesium-substituted nanohydroxyapatite coating on implant osseointegration

Objective The objective of this study was to compare magnesium‐substituted and pure hydroxyapatite coatings on the promotion of osteogenesis in vitro and on the osseointegration in vivo. Methods Electrochemically deposited pure hydroxyapatite (EDHA) or electrochemically deposited magnesium‐substitut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2013-08, Vol.24 (sA100), p.34-41
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Shi-fang, Jiang, Qiao-hong, Peel, Sean, Wang, Xiao-xiang, He, Fu-ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of this study was to compare magnesium‐substituted and pure hydroxyapatite coatings on the promotion of osteogenesis in vitro and on the osseointegration in vivo. Methods Electrochemically deposited pure hydroxyapatite (EDHA) or electrochemically deposited magnesium‐substituted hydroxyapatite (EDMHA) coatings were formed on the surface of pure titanium disks or implants. MC3T3‐E1 preosteoblasts were cultured in the EDHA and EDMHA coated disks, and cell growth, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and osteocalcin secretion were measured at various time points. For studies on osseointegration, 30 roughened implants coated either with EDHA or EDMHA (n = 15 for each coating) were implanted in the femurs of 15 NZW rabbits. After 2, 4, and 8 weeks, femurs were retrieved and prepared for histomorphometric evaluation (n = 5 for each coating at each time point). Results MC3T3‐E1 cells cultured on EDMHA coated disks showed increased cell number, ALP, and osteocalcin secretion compared with the EDHA coated disks at all time points (P 
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02362.x