Correlates of Motivation to Change in Pathological Gamblers Completing Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy

Objectives The present study analyzes the association between the motivation to change and the cognitive‐behavioral group intervention, in terms of dropouts and relapses, in a sample of male pathological gamblers. The specific objectives were as follows: (a) to estimate the predictive value of basel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical psychology 2012-07, Vol.68 (7), p.732-744
Hauptverfasser: Gómez-Peña, Mónica, Penelo, Eva, Granero, Roser, Fernández-Aranda, Fernando, Álvarez-Moya, Eva, Santamaría, Juan José, Moragas, Laura, Neus Aymamí, Maria, Gunnard, Katarina, Menchón, José M., Jimenez-Murcia, Susana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The present study analyzes the association between the motivation to change and the cognitive‐behavioral group intervention, in terms of dropouts and relapses, in a sample of male pathological gamblers. The specific objectives were as follows: (a) to estimate the predictive value of baseline University of Rhode Island Change Assessment scale (URICA) scores (i.e., at the start of the study) as regards the risk of relapse and dropout during treatment and (b) to assess the incremental predictive ability of URICA scores, as regards the mean change produced in the clinical status of patients between the start and finish of treatment. Method The relationship between the URICA and the response to treatment was analyzed by means of a pre‐post design applied to a sample of 191 patients who were consecutively receiving cognitive‐behavioral group therapy. The statistical analysis included logistic regression models and hierarchical multiple linear regression models. Results The discriminative ability of the models including the four URICA scores regarding the likelihood of relapse and dropout was acceptable (area under the receiver operating haracteristic curve: .73 and .71, respectively). No significant predictive ability was found as regards the differences between baseline and posttreatment scores (changes in R2 below 5% in the multiple regression models). Conclusions The availability of useful measures of motivation to change would enable treatment outcomes to be optimized through the application of specific therapeutic interventions. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Clin. Psychol. 68:732‐744, 2012
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.21867