Synthesis and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity evaluation of N-substituted aminomethyl-β-d-glucopyranosides

A series of N-substituted 1-aminomethyl-β-d-glucopyranoside derivatives has been prepared and tested in vitro for their inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase. A series of N-substituted 1-aminomethyl-β-d-glucopyranoside derivatives was prepared. These novel synthetic compounds were assessed in vi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2013-09, Vol.21 (17), p.5442-5450
Hauptverfasser: Bian, Xiaoli, Fan, Xiangni, Ke, Changhu, Luan, Yajun, Zhao, Guilan, Zeng, Aiguo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A series of N-substituted 1-aminomethyl-β-d-glucopyranoside derivatives has been prepared and tested in vitro for their inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase. A series of N-substituted 1-aminomethyl-β-d-glucopyranoside derivatives was prepared. These novel synthetic compounds were assessed in vitro for inhibitory activity against yeast α-glucosidase and both rat intestinal α-glucosidases maltase and sucrase. Most of the compounds displayed α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with IC50 values covering the wide range from 2.3μM to 2.0mM. Compounds 19a (IC50=2.3μM) and 19b (IC50=5.6μM) were identified as the most potent inhibitors for yeast α-glucosidase, while compounds 16 (IC50=7.7 and 15.6μM) and 19e (IC50=5.1 and 10.4μM) were the strongest inhibitors of rat intestinal maltase and sucrase. Analysis of the kinetics of enzyme inhibition indicated that 19e inhibited maltase and sucrase in a competitive manner. The results suggest that the aminomethyl-β-d-glucopyranoside moiety can mimic the substrates of α-glucosidase in the enzyme catalytic site, leading to competitive enzyme inhibition. Moreover, the nature of the N-substituent has considerable influence on inhibitory potency.
ISSN:0968-0896
1464-3391
DOI:10.1016/j.bmc.2013.06.002