Paravertebral block via the surgical field versus epidural block for patients undergoing thoracotomy: a randomized clinical trial
Purpose A paravertebral block (PVB) given via the surgical field can be safer and technically simpler than an epidural block (EP) for postoperative pain control. We conducted this clinical trial to confirm the effectiveness of PVB after thoracotomy. Methods In this non-inferiority trial, patients we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2013-09, Vol.43 (9), p.963-969 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
A paravertebral block (PVB) given via the surgical field can be safer and technically simpler than an epidural block (EP) for postoperative pain control. We conducted this clinical trial to confirm the effectiveness of PVB after thoracotomy.
Methods
In this non-inferiority trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive PVB (
n
= 35) or EP (
n
= 35). The primary endpoint was the pain assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest, 2, 24, and 48 h after thoracotomy, with the non-inferiority margin set at 15 mm. The secondary end points were the pain assessed using the VAS on exercising and on coughing, 2, 24, and 48 h after surgery, respectively, and the complications and need for additional analgesic agents.
Results
This trial revealed that PVB was not inferior to EP with respect to the primary end point: The mean VAS scores at rest, 2, 24, and 48 h after thoracotomy were 26.3, 10.8, and 8.3 mm in the PVB group and 23.6, 12.4, and 12.6 mm in the EP group, respectively (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0941-1291 1436-2813 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00595-012-0485-1 |