Effect of Nurse Practitioner Comanagement on the Care of Geriatric Conditions

Objectives To determine whether community‐based primary care physician (PCP)–nurse practitioner (NP) comanagement implementing the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE)‐2 model: (case finding, delegation of data collection, structured visit notes, physician and patient education, and linkage t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2013-06, Vol.61 (6), p.857-867
Hauptverfasser: Reuben, David B., Ganz, David A., Roth, Carol P., McCreath, Heather E., Ramirez, Karina D., Wenger, Neil S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To determine whether community‐based primary care physician (PCP)–nurse practitioner (NP) comanagement implementing the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE)‐2 model: (case finding, delegation of data collection, structured visit notes, physician and patient education, and linkage to community resources) can improve the quality of care for geriatric conditions. Design Case study. Setting Two community‐based primary care practices. Participants Patients aged 75 and older who screened positive for at least one condition: falls, urinary incontinence (UI), dementia, and depression. Intervention The ACOVE‐2 model augmented by NP comanagement of conditions. Measurements Quality of care according to medical record review using ACOVE‐3 quality indicators (QIs). Individuals receiving comanagement were compared with those who received PCP care alone in the same practices. Results Of 1,084 screened individuals, 658 (61%) screened positive for more than one condition; 485 of these were randomly selected for chart review and triggered a mean of seven QIs. A NP saw 49% for comanagement. Overall, individuals received 57% of recommended care. Quality scores for all conditions (falls, 80% vs 34%; UI, 66% vs 19%; dementia, 59% vs 38%) except depression (63% vs 60%) were higher for individuals who saw a NP. In analyses adjusted for sex and age of patient, number of conditions, site, and a NP estimate of medical management style, NP comanagement remained significantly associated with receiving recommended care (P 
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/jgs.12268