A novel approach to systematically implement the universal definition of myocardial infarction: insights from the CHAMPION PLATFORM trial

Objective To reassess the efficacy of cangrelor efficacy using the universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI). Design We adopted a novel approach to systematically implement the universal definition of MI. Two physicians blinded to treatment allocation reviewed plots of CK-MB and troponin va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2013-09, Vol.99 (17), p.1282-1287
Hauptverfasser: Leonardi, Sergio, Truffa, Adriano A M, Neely, Megan L, Tricoci, Pierluigi, White, Harvey D, Gibson, C Michael, Wilson, Matthew, Stone, Gregg W, Harrington, Robert A, Bhatt, Deepak L, Mahaffey, Kenneth W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To reassess the efficacy of cangrelor efficacy using the universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI). Design We adopted a novel approach to systematically implement the universal definition of MI. Two physicians blinded to treatment allocation reviewed plots of CK-MB and troponin values in relation to time of randomisation and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to identify patients with stable or falling biomarkers pre-PCI (ie, primary cohort), and those with post-PCI CK-MB elevations. Setting The CHAMPION PLATFORM trial. Patients Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (95%) and stable angina patients (5%). Interventions Cangrelor versus placebo. Main outcome measures The efficacy of cangrelor compared with placebo using the reclassified events (type 4a MI) and the original clinical events committee-adjudicated (CEC PCI-MI) results was investigated. Results Of 5295 patients, 3406 (64.4%) were in the primary cohort. Type 4a MI occurred in 4.3% (226 events/5295 patients) while original CEC PCI-MI occurred in 6.5% (344 events/5295 patients), a significant difference (p
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303103