Maturation, not initiation, is the major roadblock during reprogramming toward pluripotency from human fibroblasts

Pluripotency can be induced in somatic cells by forced expression of POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 (OCT3/4), sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-MYC) (OSKM). However, factor-mediated direct reprogramming is generally regarde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2013-07, Vol.110 (30), p.12172-12179
Hauptverfasser: Tanabe, Koji, Nakamura, Michiko, Narita, Megumi, Takahashi, Kazutoshi, Yamanaka, Shinya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Pluripotency can be induced in somatic cells by forced expression of POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1 (OCT3/4), sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-MYC) (OSKM). However, factor-mediated direct reprogramming is generally regarded as an inefficient and stochastic event. Contrary to this notion, we herein demonstrate that most human adult dermal fibroblasts initiated the reprogramming process on receiving the OSKM transgenes. Within 7 d, ∼20% of these transduced cells became positive for the TRA-1-60 antigen, one of the most specific markers of human pluripotent stem cells. However, only a small portion (∼1%) of these nascent reprogrammed cells resulted in colonies of induced pluripotent stem cells after replating. We found that many of the TRA-1-60–positive cells turned back to be negative again during the subsequent culture. Among the factors that have previously been reported to enhance direct reprogramming, LIN28, but not Nanog homeobox (NANOG), Cyclin D1, or p53 shRNA, significantly inhibited the reversion of reprogramming. These data demonstrate that maturation, and not initiation, is the limiting step during the direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts toward pluripotency and that each proreprogramming factor has a different mode of action.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1310291110