Comparison of Endobronchial Ultrasound and Computed Tomography With Fluoroscopy in the Guidance of Lung Cancer Biopsies: A Literature Review

Open lung biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing lung cancer, but it is an invasive approach. There have been several noninvasive methods developed to biopsy the lung. This literature review compares the use of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and computed tomography with fluoroscopy (CTF) guidan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of diagnostic medical sonography 2012-09, Vol.28 (5), p.224-230
Hauptverfasser: DiGiacinto, Dora, Bagley, Jennifer, Garrison, Miranda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Open lung biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing lung cancer, but it is an invasive approach. There have been several noninvasive methods developed to biopsy the lung. This literature review compares the use of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and computed tomography with fluoroscopy (CTF) guidance in the biopsy of lung nodules. Computed tomography with fluoroscopy has a higher diagnostic yield than endobronchial ultrasound but has more postprocedural complications. Endobronchial ultrasound guided lung biopsy is effective when the lesions are located in the right middle lobe of the lung, and overall EBUS has a low rate of complications when compared to CTF.
ISSN:8756-4793
1552-5430
DOI:10.1177/8756479312455860