Image-Guided Placement of Port Catheters: Is There an Increased Risk of Infection if the Port is Immediately Accessed and Used?

Purpose To compare complication rates in patients who have port-a-catheters inserted and left accessed for immediate use and those who have ports inserted but not accessed. Methods In this retrospective, IRB-approved study, medical records of patients who received a port catheter between 9/2009 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2013-04, Vol.14 (2), p.170-174
Hauptverfasser: Salazar, Gloria, Yeddula, Kalpana, Wicky, Stephan, Oklu, Ramhi, Ganguli, Suvranu, Waltman, Arthur C., Walker, Thomas G, Kalva, Sanjeeva P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare complication rates in patients who have port-a-catheters inserted and left accessed for immediate use and those who have ports inserted but not accessed. Methods In this retrospective, IRB-approved study, medical records of patients who received a port catheter between 9/2009 and 2/2010 were reviewed. The data collected included patient demographics, diagnosis, procedure and complications. The patients were categorized into two groups: accessed (patients in whom the port was accessed with a Huber needle for immediate intravenous use and the patient left the procedure area with needle indwelling) and control (patients in whom the ports were not accessed). Complications were classified according to Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. Results are given as mean ±SD. Statistical analysis was performed with student t test and statistical significance was considered at P
ISSN:1129-7298
1724-6032
DOI:10.5301/jva.5000110