Comparison of field- and laboratory-developed estuarine benthic communities for toxicant-exposure studies

The structures of macrobenthic communities that colonized sand-filled boxes in laboratory and field were compared to learn if laboratory-developed assemblages of animals used in toxicity studies realistically simulate those in nature. Laboratory boxes were colonized for eight weeks in the Spring and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 1983-01, Vol.20 (2), p.199-209
Hauptverfasser: Tagatz, M.E, Deans, C.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The structures of macrobenthic communities that colonized sand-filled boxes in laboratory and field were compared to learn if laboratory-developed assemblages of animals used in toxicity studies realistically simulate those in nature. Laboratory boxes were colonized for eight weeks in the Spring and Fall by planktonic larvae from continuously-supplied unfiltered seawater; field boxes, by naturally-occurring estuarine animals. Laboratory communities had larger numbers, but fewer species than field communities. One-fourth of the species found in field boxes also occurred in laboratory boxes. Species density, diversity, and dominance were similar in both environments in the Fall, but differed in the Spring. The degree of similarity of laboratory assemblages of benthic animals to the highly variable assemblages in the field indicates applicability of laboratory toxicity studies to nature.
ISSN:0049-6979
1573-2932
DOI:10.1007/BF00279630