All-female broods in Hypolimnas bolina (L.): A re-survey of West Fiji after 60 years

In the Xymphalid butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (L.) H. W. Simmonds in 1921 demonstrated, by breeding experiments, the occurrence on the islands of West Fiji of all‐female broods, and he compared their frequency with that of normal bisexual broods in the same localities. In two areas he found only unis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological journal of the Linnean Society 1983-01, Vol.19 (3), p.221-235
Hauptverfasser: CLARKE, CYRIL, JOHNSTON, GWENETH, JOHNSTON, BERNARD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the Xymphalid butterfly Hypolimnas bolina (L.) H. W. Simmonds in 1921 demonstrated, by breeding experiments, the occurrence on the islands of West Fiji of all‐female broods, and he compared their frequency with that of normal bisexual broods in the same localities. In two areas he found only unisexual families (14 of them in Suva and one on Vanua Levuj, in one island (Ovalau) only a single bisexual brood and in the other two islands, Taveuni and Kandavu, one bisexual and one of each type respectively. Nearly 60 years, and probably at least 150 generations later, we found that all‐female broods were still present in four of the five islands re‐investigated, and breeding showed that in these four (which included Suva) the proportion of the two types of female was approximately equal. In the fifth island only a bisexual family was bred. The only marked change between 1921 and 1980 was in the Suva area, where Simmonds found far more unisexual females than we did. By carrying out spermatophore counts in many of our wild females we found that almost all of them had been mated, the majority of them on one occasion only. Though the data are scanty, they suggest that there is no wastage of females and that the population in 1980 was stable for the two types of brood. Reasons for our findings are discussed, particularly in the light of the Heuch model, but we conclude that no entirely satisfactory explanation has yet been given for the persistence of all‐female broods. Again, there is so far no explanation of the mechanism though we favour a cytoplasmic factor. We feel that the status of H, bolina as a mimic of species of Euploea is less assured as the result of our survey.
ISSN:0024-4066
1095-8312
DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1983.tb00785.x