Behavioral effects of chronic lead exposure in the adult rat

Adult rats fed daily rations of laboratory chow laced with lead acetate, were tested for operant (schedule-controlled) responding and conditioned suppression. In Experiment 1, animals receiving 10 mg/kg lead showed significantly lower operant response rates (lever pressing) than controls. Conditione...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior biochemistry and behavior, 1983-01, Vol.18 (6), p.833-840
Hauptverfasser: Nation, Jack R., Bourgeois, Anthony E., Clark, Donald E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Adult rats fed daily rations of laboratory chow laced with lead acetate, were tested for operant (schedule-controlled) responding and conditioned suppression. In Experiment 1, animals receiving 10 mg/kg lead showed significantly lower operant response rates (lever pressing) than controls. Conditioned suppression performance was not different between the two groups. During retraining that followed a 42 day no-training period, lead-treated subjects showed greater percent of prior baseline responding than controls. The groups were not different on a test for stimulus control or an appetitive resistance to extinction test. In Experiment 2, separate lead-treated groups were chronically exposed to either 10 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg lead daily. Behavioral tests showed that while the lowest lead level (1 mg/kg) occasioned higher rates of operant lever pressing relative to controls, the highest level (10 mg/kg) again produced lower rates. On a retraining task administered after an interpolated 90 day no-training period, the two highest exposure groups were significantly above controls regarding percent of baseline responding and there was evidence that the 5 mg/kg group was significantly superior to controls in terms of absolute response rate. No differences in conditioned suppression or resistance to extinction were observed in the second experiment.
ISSN:0091-3057
1873-5177
DOI:10.1016/S0091-3057(83)80001-X