Effect of low-dose tamoxifen after surgical excision of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a large retrospective monoinstitutional cohort study

Postsurgical treatment of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) with standard doses of tamoxifen has not reached a consensus yet. Given positive results of low-dose tamoxifen on breast cancer biomarkers modulation, we analyzed a large cohort of DIN patients treated with low-dose tamoxifen or no tre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2013-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1859-1866
Hauptverfasser: Guerrieri-Gonzaga, A., Lazzeroni, M., Botteri, E., Serrano, D., Rotmensz, N., Varricchio, M.-C., Cazzaniga, M., Bollani, G., Mora, S., Montefrancesco, C., Pruneri, G., Viale, G., Intra, M., Galimberti, V., Goldhirsch, A., Bagnardi, V., Bonanni, B., DeCensi, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Postsurgical treatment of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) with standard doses of tamoxifen has not reached a consensus yet. Given positive results of low-dose tamoxifen on breast cancer biomarkers modulation, we analyzed a large cohort of DIN patients treated with low-dose tamoxifen or no treatment as per institutional guidelines. All consecutive women operated on at the European Institute of Oncology for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive DIN (474 treated with low-dose tamoxifen and 509 untreated patients) were followed up for a median of 7 years. Compared with untreated patients, a significant 30% reduction in breast cancer risk was observed on low-dose tamoxifen with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.94], with a greater benefit in postmenopausal (HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.34–0.94) than in premenopausal women (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.54–1.17). Treated patients with ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) >50% DIN had a lower incidence of breast events than untreated ones (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.40–0.94), whereas no protective effect has been observed in patients with ER or PgR
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdt113