Long‐Term Outcome After Heart Transplantation Predicted by Quantitative Myocardial Blush Grade in Coronary Angiography

The purpose of our study was to investigate whether the quantification of myocardial blush grade (MBG) during surveillance coronary angiography can predict long‐term outcome after heart transplantation (HT). In 105 HT recipients who underwent cardiac catheterization, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2013-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1491-1502
Hauptverfasser: Hofmann, N. P., Voss, A., Dickhaus, H., Erbacher, M., Doesch, A., Ehlermann, P., Gitsioudis, G., Buss, S. J., Giannitsis, E., Katus, H. A., Korosoglou, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of our study was to investigate whether the quantification of myocardial blush grade (MBG) during surveillance coronary angiography can predict long‐term outcome after heart transplantation (HT). In 105 HT recipients who underwent cardiac catheterization, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was assessed visually using the ISHLT grading scale (prospective cohort study). MBG was quantified by dividing the plateau of contrast agent gray‐level intensity (Gmax) by the time‐to‐peak intensity (Tmax). In a subgroup (n = 72), myocardial perfusion index by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was assessed. During a mean follow‐up duration of 2.7 (standard deviation [SD] 1.0) years, 26 patients experienced cardiac events, including 7 with cardiac death and 19 who underwent coronary revascularization. Gmax/Tmax was related to CAV by ISHLT criteria and to subsequent cardiac events. By univariate analysis, patient age, organ age, CAV, MBG and myocardial perfusion index by CMR were all predictive for cardiac events. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that Gmax/Tmax provided the most robust prediction of cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06–0.64, p 
ISSN:1600-6135
1600-6143
DOI:10.1111/ajt.12223