Plerixafor and G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with NHL, Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma: results from the expanded access program

Before US regulatory approval, an expanded access program provided plerixafor to patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD) or multiple myeloma (MM) who had not previously failed mobilization and were otherwise candidates for auto-SCT. Patients received granulocyte-CSF (G-CS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2013-06, Vol.48 (6), p.777-781
Hauptverfasser: Shaughnessy, P, Uberti, J, Devine, S, Maziarz, R T, Vose, J, Micallef, I, Jacobsen, E, McCarty, J, Stiff, P, Artz, A, Ball, E D, Berryman, R, Dugan, M, Joyce, R, Hsu, F J, Johns, D, McSweeney, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Before US regulatory approval, an expanded access program provided plerixafor to patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD) or multiple myeloma (MM) who had not previously failed mobilization and were otherwise candidates for auto-SCT. Patients received granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) 10 mcg/kg daily and plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg starting on day 4 with apheresis on day 5; all repeated daily until collection was complete. Overall, 104 patients received ⩾1 dose of plerixafor. The addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in a median threefold increase in peripheral blood CD34+ cell count between days 4 and 5. Among 43 NHL patients, 74% met the target of ⩾5 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg (median, 1 day apheresis, range 1–5 days); among 7 HD patients, 57% met the target of ⩾5 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg (median, 2 days apheresis, range 1–3); and among 54 MM patients, 89% met the target of ⩾6 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg (median, 1 day apheresis, range 1–4). Overall, 93% of patients had ⩾2 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg collected within 1–3 days. Plerixafor-related toxicities were minimal. Engraftment kinetics, graft durability and transplant outcomes demonstrated no unexpected outcomes. Efficacy and safety results were similar to results in phase II and III clinical trials.
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/bmt.2012.219